In a message dated 1/18/2005 4:06:55 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


To call that ad hominem is straining at gnats IMO.  She did not call him any ugly names.  She is criticizing a theology not a person. Izzy (Since you asked.)



So, if I said that her theology was thoughtless, without practical consequence and stupid,  that would not be ad hominem?  Tha leaves open a whole host of negatives.   Awesome.  This squeal without the pig thingy may work after all   --   that is if you don't give a care about the person you criticize. 
John

 

You can carry anything to the extreme, JD.  (Especially you!) J  Izzy

Reply via email to