Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional Christian theology -- does sham mean anything

[Judy Taylor]

jt: No John, apparently I don't have a clue what you were talking about but no point in being the voice

of the accuser and getting your knickers in a knot. 

 

Why not explain the interaction below to me in a patient and lucid manner as a pastor, bishop, beloved

etc. or even a normal vanilla Christian might do because you are beginning to sound like 'G'  with all

this 'fantasy' talk.  jt

 

 

On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:22:33 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

What in the hell are you talking about?   Don't make up stuff and then trash talk your own fantasy>  That is stupid. 

 Absolutely nothing in the above has anything to do with what I wrote.   I was asking a question about ad hominem  --  

but, of course, since you don't bother to actually read my post,  I can see how you get confused.   In fact, Judy  --  

just ignore my posts altoghether.   I will go and do likewise.  

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

In a message dated 1/19/2005 8:45:32 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

I don't have any "teachings" of my own John; my goal is to agree with the "Teacher" and receive

and walk in His doctrine. If you call that "stupid" then that is between you and the Lord. I would try

not to take it to heart but it would not be conducive to any kind of fellowship because you would

have broken the royal law.

 

On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:05:58 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

So, no problem with calling your teachings stupid?  Did you somehow overlook the purpose of my post.  John

 

In a message dated 1/19/2005 6:41:04 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Why not?  We should be able to be Berean here which is to compare different teachings alongside the Word of God
How does one insult a teaching it is either true or false and if false it needs to be brought to the light. If a person holding on
to it as truth is insulted then they are holding on too tightly and it is a chance to let go.  Only truth will stand in that day.
 
I count only four contributors on this forum who apprently can't comply.  4 out of 14 contributors  --   obviously it can be done.
And you don't overlook anything considered negative.    Nothing.  John

jt: Comply with what John?  Is there some kind of rule book I don't know about?  jt