RE: [TruthTalk] Evangelism

[ShieldsFamily]

J   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 9:02 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Evangelism   In a message dated 1/26/2005 6:02:41 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: the teacher is omitted?   On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:50:07 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: To insist on calling such "pop theology" is to insult the teaching rather than deal with the issue, itself. John   A secret between you and I , uh  ............  me.  On TT insulting the teaching is permissible, insulting the teacher is somehow not.  You must have forgotten.    I tried this approach on my wife the other night.    I told her that the red dress with the large horizontal lines  (I like the blue one better   ------   with the large horizontal lines) made her look fat.   Didn't say she     WAS        fat, mind you.    Anyway   ...............    she grounded me from the red beer cabinet for a week and forced me to wear my speed-o in public.   My "public" begged me to ask forgiveness claiming that the punishment was more against them than against me.   I  didn't get it, but I asked anyway.....................................she said no.  She says no a lot.   That's why I spend so much time reading my Bible.  Heck  --   when I stop and think about it --   I'm a cottonpicken SAINT  !!!!   Salute the power of "no."  and thanks forr asking ..   J