[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/5/2005 8:01:37 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
John wrote:
    
What if I  think "pearls before swine" more aptly
applies to the Miller Four.   Is that allowed.
      
Now you are getting too specific about specific members.  You can get away 
with referring to "hardened Protestants" or "hardened Bible Thumpers" or 
maybe even "hardened fundamentalists" with an implication toward such 
individuals.  However, expect to be challenged on your interpretation if you 

were to make such assertions.

    

But what if I believe that the Miller Four (whoever that really is) is an 
alliance of hardened legalist?   What then.  It only works if it is hardened 
Mormons.   As long as I refrain from specific names,  I am clear.    I love 
legalist.   They always flame out in their attempt at fashoning laws that benefit 
themselves and exclude others.  Here, I speak of "legalist" in general and not 
of a particular legalist.  

Jd 
  
=====================================================
Call me anything you like,John.  It won't bother me.  Your opinion is not important enough to get worked up over.  All of this smacks of people thinking more of themselves than they should, and getting aggravated when others do not see them with the samee esteem.  It is called pride, and it is time to get over it. 
Terry

  

Reply via email to