|
Judy wrote >
However, we are supposed to grow out of it (that's if we are part of the real
Church); contrary to what some claim we are not just sucked up into Christ
because we have not refused the incarnation. If this is a backhanded reference to me, Judy, you have missed the
point. Please observe the terms I use more closely, and then have the
integrity, when referencing me, to apply them the way I do. I have never said
anything about the Church being populated by "osmosis," exclusion
coming only to those who have refused our Lord. God was in Christ reconciling the world
to himself, but the world was not made the Church in the atonement: Paul
says, "therefore be reconciled to God." The Church universal is
made up of those who have not only not rejected Jesus Christ
but have themselves believed the good news of their salvation and received the
gift of the Holy Spirit. Local churches may be frequented by
"non-believers" of varying degrees, and this for different reasons,
but the "Church" itself is populated by believers. Bill Excuse me, Bill, but I think it would do
us well to drop all the backhand reference accusations. Love is not testy. (I
forgot what verse that is. J) When Judy said that it
made me think of the |
- Re: [TruthTalk] Basis of Unity ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] Basis of Unity Bill Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Basis of Unity Bill Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Basis of Unity ttxpress
- Re: [TruthTalk] Basis of Unity Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Basis of Unity Lance Muir
- Re: [TruthTalk] Basis of Unity Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Basis of Unity Lance Muir
- Re: [TruthTalk] Basis of Unity ttxpress
- Re: [TruthTalk] Basis of Unity Bill Taylor
- RE: [TruthTalk] Basis of Unity ShieldsFamily

