Re: [TruthTalk] Basis of Unity

[Judy Taylor]

Lance, I see you making enquiries about what constitutes an ad hominem remark, apparently you can't distinguish because you continue in it yourself and this is a perfect example   "When it comes to you" personalizes this remark it so that you are no longer dealing with ideas or issues - you are taking a swipe at my person - Also you never speak for yourself - you claim to represent the opinion of "most"  which IMO is a gross exaggeration.   So, of what value is this communication, it does nothing other than try to tear down. jt   On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 06:03:49 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jt: BECAUSE 'through' is the operative word in your post. IMO, most have found this to be impossible when it comes to you. (The only exception(s) would be the Mormons)   From: Judy Taylor On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 14:49:54 -0700 "Bill Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:  I love discussing ideas and I enjoy reading or listening to the ideas of others (that is why I am still on TT) --  but I hate debate. If there doesn't appear to be any chance of resolve, I would rather disengage than ride a disagreement into the gutter.   Thanks for your response Bill, But how do you know there will never be any chance of resolve if you don't follow it through?   I think this is one of the things that drives a lot of women 'nuts' about their husbands. They get into some kind of an every day conflict - she wants to talk it through and he puts up a wall. So they are in a stalemate with no resolution in sight.  What is so threatening about talking things through??    Just wondering.... judyt