Re: [TruthTalk] Basis of Unity

[Knpraise]

Of the Miller Four, it appears that two have failed to deal with the challenge.   They are,in  fact, ready  to condemn my doctrines, or BillyT's or (really) whoever but really want us to guess at what point we, the condemned, have gone off the beaten path  (emphasis on "beasten")   This should be a rather simple task.   You all agree that unity is actually speaking and believing the very same things.  I assume that if you all agree with that, it is, in fact,  a reality already.    Palease refer to this reality and share with us those specific doctrines that find you all in total agreement.    I do not plan on arguing any of the teachings presented.   You get a free ride from the Smithmeister.   None of those tough, down to earth questions that drive you all crazy.  No more of that goat-roper logic that sets you back in your chairs, the dim light of the monitor shinning on your frustration, shaking your head and saying (perhaps out loud) Dang, he's got me again !!!  None of that. Only compliance !!!   That's right.   Happy compliance from the Bishop, here.  I just want to see if it can be done.   Really.   So, before you are forced to say, "Dang, he's got me again,"   try it.   Why not refer to the work of Sir Lance Muir.  In a recent paper, Sir Muir recorded a rather impressive list of discussion topics present on this forum.   I can only assume that the Miller Four agree on one end or the other of those various considerations.  The work is already done.  If not, I or someone in the Righteous Triad  will be happy to help with the doctrinal listing.  

Brother John.  




In a message dated 2/7/2005 6:22:31 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

this is what happens every single time this comes up.    Those who insist that "unity of faith" is based on specific and doctrinal agreement  -- they immediately start twisting and turning  --   saying things like "it's in you  B  I   B  L  E  ."   The never want to just write down those doctrines we need to agree on. 

But I am a persistent little guy -------  sooooooooo, instead of being cute,  bone up to the bar and put it in black and white.   Remember, I am not one who thinks this will work  -  but you and your buds do   --------------    so write it down and I will do my best to agree.   Actually,   we do not all have to agree on the doctrines  --   maybe just the Miller Four can write and agree and the rest of us will take it from there. So only four of us need to agree and the rest will be followers.   Do I have an AMEN>   

Here is what the Smithmeister is going to do.    He will commit to a radical and complete theology change, if necessary, if you --  the Miller Four  --   will come up with a comprehensive list of things that are clearly taught in scripture and (therefore, I guess) we MUST agree on.   I am saying  ------------------   no argument from Smithson.   So here is your chance to bring me back from the other side.   Back into the fold.   And if the Miller Four can't to it,  maybe just two of you.  

Let's get it on and stop making excuses.  Black and white, people.   And keep the sentences simple, for obvious reasons.

It is already written down see the Bible for further instruction.

Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Corinthians 1:10  Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you; but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment




ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

        He did.  Itâs in your B-I-B-L-E.  Iz

 




Here is a list of items we need to agree on before unity in the faith can be claimed:

(why didn't God in Script do this  - J

Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! â What will yours do?

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.