John wrote:
> The fact of the matter is this   ----  you have
> pretended to know something about my character
> because of my use of the word "gay."

I haven't said anything about your character.  I don't know where you are 
getting this idea.

What I was saying is that your language reflects an intrusion from the 
homosexual agenda and political correct advocates.  You have argued with 
Judy (as Bill has too) that one's viewpoint is not developed in a vacuum. 
Now you seem to be offended if I point out just one of many influences upon 
you and your philosophy concerning homosexuals.

John wrote:
> You are out of line and insulting and have
> accomplish nothing with your comment.

I'm out of line and insulting because I point out your language choice and 
its reflection upon your philosophy?  Talk about being anti-intellectual... 
never mind.

I do wish you would try to see my point.  I also wish you would stop using 
the word "gay" to refer to homosexuals.  If only you were here to come 
preach with me on campus and see how riled up the spirits get when you use 
the word "homosexual" instead of "gay."  They hate it because they are not 
getting their way.  It would probably impress you about the need to change 
your language.

Peace be with you.
David Miller. 


----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to