In a message dated 2/28/2005 2:59:16 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


myth [it's a terrible a misrepresentation of Barth's theology, below, while Barth's primary issue is with the 'orthodox' meaning of 'history' per se ; e.g., (for you) to question the 'historical' situation (and meaning) of the NT/resurrection is not denial nullifying the salvific implications of Rom 10]
 



G's scripted formulae:   [ ] = myth     ;            (  )  =  agreeable (to G) alternative.

This is the pattern I have seen.   true for the above?  Myth  -  (pattern ) ? 

JD

Reply via email to