Re: [TruthTalk] Albert Einstein & Karl Barth

Tue, 01 Mar 2005 05:41:54 -0800

These guys are so shook up by the Fundamentalists that anyone that disagrees with them MUST be one.

Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jt's 'slip slidin' away' once again. When your asked ANYTHING with some specificity, you just turn the tables thus, critiquing the one who asks you a genuine question.
 
Will you:
1. Demonstrate my meaning?
2. Address the issue therein?
 
Please put up or......
----- Original Message -----
Sent: March 01, 2005 07:31
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Albert Einstein & Karl Barth

 
 
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 07:18:32 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
When you, David, Kevin et al SELECT TEXTS which you deem appropriate for any issue under discussion, you are interpreting, teaching, imagining..God's own answers to that which is being spoken of. I do not believe that you've ever 'seen' that, nor do I believe that you ever will 'see' that. IMO it's not complicated.
 
jt: You don't have to "believe me" Lance since I'm not looking for followers. However, I do think it tragic that you know so much about movies and lines in movies and so little about the Word of God which shows me clearly which type of wisdom has your full attention.  Obviously you are not involved with taking thoughts captive to the obedience of Christ but rather walking in the counsel of the ungodly and sitting in the seat of the scoffer (with regard to DM anyway)  jt
 
 
 
I don't demonize any part of the body per se Lance but without spiritual discernment everyone is open to deception.  Look at how the adversary uses the "imagination" and John Lennon's song is a perfect example.  God does not reveal Himself to mankind through their fallen imaginations. Nor does He reveal His Word to us in this way.  Faith imagination is a misnomer.  How do you know the Jesus you conjure up is not the "angel of light?"  God  will either hide or reveal Himself to whomsoever He wills - and He hides Himself from the proud but gives grace to the humble.  jt
 
 
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 06:20:09 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jt:'I don't want a Jesus of my own imagination..'
1. Please don't demonize the imagination. It comes into play in all of our thinking (theologizing). The kind of 'interpreting' that you, David et al do on a regular basis.
 
2. Therefore, like it or not, YOU DO HAVE A JESUS OF YOUR OWN 'IMAGINING'. 
G, you sound just like my mother who, last time I was with her was in total unbelief and I have no reason
to believe things have changed since then.  She told me one would have to have a good imagination to
believe the Bible.  This is the fruit of liberal unbelieving scholars and clergy on the radio and in her Church
which BTW has lost it's candlestick and is getting ready to close the doors and auction the building.  God will
not be mocked and ppl always reap what they sow.  I don't want a Jesus of my own imagination who would
just be another antichrist figure.  judyt
 
 
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 22:04:52 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
So the ressurection story developed over time from a legend?
A tall tale?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'saga' and 'legend' are types of history, the event/s (or Event/s) of which gives rise to 'stories'
 
pastors tell ppl stories, in this case the story of the resurrection
 
it's like the story of JCs birth--in KJ English someone writes: ~ 'now the birth of Jesus was on this wise' or Jesus' birth came about like this...
 
such stories do not falsify such events (with a capital 'E'); they let you imagine the truth involved..kinda like a good (B Dylan:) song
 
 
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:34:20 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
So maybe you could explain .. these quotes, why is the ressurection a "Legend"?
 
||

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. Learn more.
 
 
 

Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.

Reply via email to