In a message dated 3/2/2005 7:51:21 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Of course. I was speaking of the original ms. We do realize that we are reading English translations of such, and must therefore rely upon the best available sources. We donât need to squabble about those again. Izzy
And you question the use of "imagination?" You make assertions about manuscripts that do not exist. I can go with thought inspiration quicker than "verbal plenary." Word for word dictation would eliminate the personalities of the individual authors -- which is not the case. Your last sentence indicates a desire to avoid further discussion. Alrighty then.
JD
- RE: [TruthTalk] Albert Einstein & Karl Barth Knpraise
- RE: [TruthTalk] Albert Einstein & Karl Barth ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] Albert Einstein & Karl Barth Lance Muir
- Re: [TruthTalk] Albert Einstein & Karl Bart... Terry Clifton
- Re: [TruthTalk] Albert Einstein & Karl ... Lance Muir
- RE: [TruthTalk] Albert Einstein & Karl Bart... ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] Albert Einstein & Karl ... Lance Muir
- RE: [TruthTalk] Albert Einstein & Karl ... Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Albert Einstein & ... Bill Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Albert Einstein &a... Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Albert Einstei... Bill Taylor

