BLAINE: Which "Word of God?" KJV? Modern translations? They have all
been changed. There is no such thing as a pure form of the "word of
God" as known by so-called "Christians."
been changed. There is no such thing as a pure form of the "word of
God" as known by so-called "Christians."
The BOM has not been changed, nor the First Vision, nor the history of the church?
I have an 1881 BoM wanna compare?
The Bible I hold is word for word same as the Isaiah scroll from at least 200 BCE
Since Joe brought us the RESTORATION, where can I get a copy of the LOST books Joe RESTORED?
LOST BOOKS in the BOM
Where are the records of Zeniff refered to in Mosiah 25:5
How about the words of Zenoc, Neum and Zenos 1Nephi19:10
Or the written word of Zenos and Zenock Alma 33:3,13,15
Where are the records of Zeniff refered to in Mosiah 25:5
How about the words of Zenoc, Neum and Zenos 1Nephi19:10
Or the written word of Zenos and Zenock Alma 33:3,13,15
"I would inform you that I translated by the gift and power of God, and caused to be written one hundred and sixteen pages, the which I took from the book of Lehi, which was an account abridged from the plates of Lehi, by the hand of Mormon; which said account some person or persons have stolen and kept from me" Preface to the original Book of Mormon.
Where can I get a copy of the BOOK of LEHI? 116 pages of the translation by Joe NEVER PRINTED - LOST by Martin Harris. Was anything important to your salvation in there? How does this make the BOM the most correct book on earth?
Where can I get a copy of the BOOK of LEHI? 116 pages of the translation by Joe NEVER PRINTED - LOST by Martin Harris. Was anything important to your salvation in there? How does this make the BOM the most correct book on earth?
BoM admits it is full of error
"And now, if there are faults they are the mistakes of men; wherefore, condemn not the things of God, that ye may be found spotless at the judgment-seat of Christ." Title page Book of Mormon Is this an admission of faults?
"and if we could have written in Hebrew, behold, ye would have had no imperfection in our record" Mormon 9:33 More slip-ups?
"I think this sacred, but if I err, excuse me" 1Nephi 19:6
"and if we could have written in Hebrew, behold, ye would have had no imperfection in our record" Mormon 9:33 More slip-ups?
"I think this sacred, but if I err, excuse me" 1Nephi 19:6
There is NO EXCUSE when dealing with mens souls!
"written according to my memory" Esther 5:1
"written according to my memory" Esther 5:1
Hope he did not slip up & forget something important!
"written to the best of my knowledge" Jacob 7:26
"written to the best of my knowledge" Jacob 7:26
Faults, errors, according to mans memory & knowledge, mistakes, partial accounts, imperfections, lost prophets and lost portions/books, stolen sections, only 1/3 translated; hardly a faith promoting testimony! You trust your soul to such an imperfect error prone cooked/modified book?
Where does the BIBLE ever admit to any of these imperfections?
Satan cast doubt on God's word Genesis 3 "Yea hath God said...?"
You bit the apple, you donned his Apron, now you too doubt God's word!
Where does Jesus ever cast doubt on God's word?
Jesus said John 10:35 "the scripture can not be broken" You say he is wrong! I say you are wrong! I trust Jesus, not Joe.
Romans 10:17 "so then faith cometh by hearing and hearing by the word of God"
It is no wonder you have NO faith, you discount God's word in ignorance of the facts.
Satan cast doubt on God's word Genesis 3 "Yea hath God said...?"
You bit the apple, you donned his Apron, now you too doubt God's word!
Where does Jesus ever cast doubt on God's word?
Jesus said John 10:35 "the scripture can not be broken" You say he is wrong! I say you are wrong! I trust Jesus, not Joe.
Romans 10:17 "so then faith cometh by hearing and hearing by the word of God"
It is no wonder you have NO faith, you discount God's word in ignorance of the facts.
What if Joe Sliped-up again? Are you willing to TRUST your ETERNAL soul to such a SLIP-UP, hope so, "I Know the Church is True, I know the Church is true" Religion?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BLAINE: Which "Word of God?" KJV? Modern translations? They have all
been changed. There is no such thing as a pure form of the "word of
God" as known by so-called "Christians."
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 01:33:56 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>writes:
> I don't have to chug the whole quart of milk to know it is putrid, I
> just need one whiff.
>
> B. B. Warfield: "It is very plain that he who modifies the teachings
> of the Word of God in the smallest particular at the dictation of
> any �man-made opinion� has already deserted the Christian ground,
> and is already, in principle, a �heretic.� The very essence of
> �heresy� is that the modes of thought and tenets originating
> elsewhere than in the Scriptures of God are given decisive weight
> when they clash with the teachings of God�s Word ..."
>
> BLAINE: "Teachings of God's word" as interpreted by whomever! Is what
this man is saying, namely himself. In other words, don't disagree with
my opinions, or you are a heretic!! "Every man walketh in his own
way." D&C 1
> i would rather read the orthodox Theologians.
BLAINE: The following is but one man's OPINION!! Not fact. There
are many and varied opinions in traditional Christianity today . . .
"every man walketh in his own way. . . . which is Babylon, which shall
fall."
> "... the highest proof of Scripture derives in general from the fact
> that God in person speaks in it. The prophets and apostles do not
> boast either of their keenness or of anything that obtains credit
> for them as they speak; nor do they dwell upon rational proofs.
> Rather, they bring forward God�s holy name, that by it the whole
> world may be brought into obedience to him ... If we desire to
> provide in the best way for our consciences - that they may not be
> perpetually beset by the instability of doubt or vacillation, and
> that they may not also boggle at the smallest quibbles - we ought to
> seek our conviction in a higher place than human reasons, judgments,
> or conjectures, that is, in the secret testimony of the Spirit"
> (Institutes of the Christian Religion, 1.7.4).
>
> Again you just cast dispersions
BLAINE: You mean "aspersions?"
and will not deal with the issues
> Still waiting on the contextx
> still waiting on the list of errors in the KJB
> still waiting on Which Greek?, which edition?, which printing?
>
>
> There are no heresies in a dead religion. Andre Suares
BLAINE: YOU are referring to modern (traditional)"Christianity" as a
dead religion. Right?
>
> There is no error so monstrous that it fails to find defenders
>
> BLAINE: Kevin is one of the most vociferous of these defenders of
Tradition and the commandments of men, otherwise called "Modern
Christianity." "Every man walketh in his own way," including Perry,
Kevin, Judy, , etc.
More "opinion" below . . . but close to the truth, very close . . . .
Which is, "We believe the Bible to be the word of God as far as it is
translated correctly." Joseph Smith
> John William Burgon: "... the Bible is none other than the voice of
> Him that sitteth upon the Throne! Every book of it, every chapter of
> it, every verse of it, every word of it, every syllable of it (where
> are we to stop?) every letter of it, is the direct utterance of the
> Most High! ... Well spake the HOLY GHOST by the mouth of the many
> blessed men who wrote it. The Bible is none other than the Word of
> God: not some part of it more, some part of it less; but all alike
> the utterance of Him who sitteth upon the Throne, absolute,
> faultless, unerring, supreme."
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> One simply cannot read Barth and come away from that occasion with
> any opinion other than a profound respect for the effort. Agree or
> disagree with his conclusions, the man clearly pays homage to
> Christ, the Word, the resurrected and living Christ. The words of
> a internet homeboy to the contrary. Hopefully no one on this site
> will give consideration to dishonest opinions without having
> actually read his {Barth} work. Kevin has done no such thing and
> is, therefore, grossly limited in what he might say.
> JD
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
