As Kevin has pointed out, the agreement between all the copies verifies the authenticity of the originals. This is only hard to understand if you are wishing to deny the authenticity of the Word.  Izzy

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 11:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Albert Einstein & Karl Barth

 

In a message dated 3/2/2005 1:55:54 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


Dear JD,



Please be notified that the FIRST copy of scripture, written by the FIRST writer (ie: Matthew, Mark, Luke, John) was THE ORIGINAL.  There definitely WAS one, whether you have a copy in your sweaty little hand or not.

 


Love, Izzy



This makes me think Lance is right.   If there were no "originals,"  there would have been no Bible  ( I can't believe I am having to point this out).   OF COURSE  I KNOW THIS.   What you don't know is that without these origianls, one cannot make any real conclusions about "inspiration" and these manuscripts. 

JD

Reply via email to