RE: [TruthTalk] Albert Einstein & Karl Barth

[Kevin Deegan]

As Kevin has pointed out, the agreement between all the copies verifies the authenticity of the originals. This is only hard to understand if you are wishing to deny the authenticity of the Word.  Izzy

You know the game where you have a line of people, the first person whispers a phrase into the ear of the next, who then does the same right on down the line now suppose that at the end of the line the phrase comes out the same. That would be pretty hard to do. Now suppose there were thousands of lines in all parts of the world, separated by distance & by time and they all came out with the same phrase That would take Divine intervention as it did in the Majority text. Now the Minority Text comes up with all sorts of different phrases and does not even agree with itself, that tells me someone messed with the message along the way!

Any other explanations someone want to offer?

This is prima facae evidence against the Critical text. Just look at it's face multiple handwritings, multiple corrections, missing sections, missing verses, multiple erasings

It is a Grossly Disfigured text. It is not trustworthy and Corrupted by correctors and the "scholars" NOR Humpty Dumpty will ever be able to put it back together!

ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

As Kevin has pointed out, the agreement between all the copies verifies the authenticity of the originals. This is only hard to understand if you are wishing to deny the authenticity of the Word.  Izzy

 

---

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 11:22 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Albert Einstein & Karl Barth

 

In a message dated 3/2/2005 1:55:54 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Dear JD,



Please be notified that the FIRST copy of scripture, written by the FIRST writer (ie: Matthew, Mark, Luke, John) was THE ORIGINAL.  There definitely WAS one, whether you have a copy in your sweaty little hand or not.

 

Love, Izzy

This makes me think Lance is right.   If there were no "originals,"  there would have been no Bible  ( I can't believe I am having to point this out).   OF COURSE  I KNOW THIS.   What you don't know is that without these origianls, one cannot make any real conclusions about "inspiration" and these manuscripts. 

JD

---

Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web