Dave:You've been reading TT'ers for a looooooong time. To my knowledge there are no Roman Catholic or Orthodox participants.
 
You ask 'how many Protestants do think alike?" I believe I've witnessed more than a touch of humour on your part from time to time sooooo, is this one of those times?
 
I'd simply say that I wish I could tell you, from my 18 years of experience interacting with the 'non-catholic, non-ordox' "believers", that what you've witnessed on TT is atypical but I CANNOT! 
 
By the by I believe that the same level of diversity exists withink the Mormon community.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: March 30, 2005 09:52
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Loving and Merciful God of Justice

In a message dated 3/29/2005 10:00:42 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


If the length of this exchange caused some to move on without reading the full exchange, perhaps a second look will be worth the effort.   Much food for thought regarding hell, torture,  the singleness of the sin event contrasted with the eternity of the punishment. 

My only frustration with Dave's response is that it includes an insistence that (1) "protestants" are those who are not Mormon




DAVEH:   Nonsense, John. Well, I stand corrected.   I guess my may concern, here, is that Mormons see Catholics and Protestant and the "true church,"  the Mormons.    I've never thought that way at all.  My primary interest is in Protestantism, as I view Catholicism as having a reasonable claim to the priesthood, yet Protestantism has sprung from that framework by rejecting their authority. You make this statement and include all who are not Catholic.  Close but no cigar.  Here is a specific definition that catches it for me  --   a member of any of several church denominations denying the universal authority of the Pope and affirming the Reformation principles of justification by faith alone, the priesthood of all believers, and the primacy of the Bible as the only source of revealed truth.   To me that is a curious perspective that is fascinating and the reason I am trying to learn how Protestants believe and think.  More than I have complained about your use of the word "protestant."   If you are trying to understand, why not include in the fascinating search an understanding of those who are not attached to the Reformation?  Who teach  grace as it stands against those who preach legalism (whether of the Mormon variety or of the Miller brand0, who reject the notion that membership in the "right church" counts for anything at all, in an eternal sense.   You have the KJV of the bible.   It teaches these things  --  your problem, of course, is that your KJV does not have a supportive text (a Greek text).  Do I mis-stpeak?   Your views of the biblical message are fashioned and shaped by the dictates of the True Church   -----   something I find to be somewhat nonsensical.  Care to discuss/defend agains that claim?   It would seem to me that, sense the biblical message was here long before the Mormon message  --   the bibilical account would be the place to begin and defend.   Shall we? 
and (2) that all "protestants" think alike.

DAVEH:  I realize that all "protestants" don't necessarily think alike.  However, I am interested in knowing how many do think alike. What is of interest in that !!??
It seems to me that if we are going to borrow a word from the non-Mormon world, we should include the attached definition instead of making up our own  ---   it is confusing to those of us who are not "protestant" by historic definition.  

DAVEH:  So, how do you define Protestantism, John?   From my perspective, it is those who accept the Trinity Doctrine, yet reject Catholicism.  While that may be a bit simplistic, it seems to work for me.  Do you view my definition as flawed? Dave, this is YOUR definition.   It is not a historical definition.   Shall we use yours or that which grows out of the history of the circumstance.    If so....how?


Reply via email to