[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 3/31/2005 5:02:43 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:=================================================================== It is my belief,John, that Paul had to die for Christ. Not because Christ died for Paul, but in order to eliminate any claim that he switched sides for an ulterior motive. If Paul had taken up collections to support his missions, some would claim he was in it for the money. He had to be self supporting, and he knew that. The same for his death. Had he not died for Christ, some would have claimed he switched for his own benefit (power, money, fill in the --------------.) He did what had to be done to complete the task given him. It was fitting that the Jews kill him, just as they killed Jesus and the prophets before him. You have me wondering. What does your advertizment say? Don't be afraid to answer. I am not looking for a reason to find fault with you. Terry Terry |
- Re: [TruthTalk] John 16:13 fg. - Perhaps it's focus is WHO n... Terry Clifton
- Re: [TruthTalk] John 16:13 fg. - Perhaps it's focus is ... Terry Clifton
- Re: [TruthTalk] John 16:13 fg. - Perhaps it's focus is ... Bill Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] John 16:13 fg. - Perhaps it's focus is ... Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] John 16:13 fg. - Perhaps it's focus... Terry Clifton
- Re: [TruthTalk] John 16:13 fg. - Perhaps it's focus is ... Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] John 16:13 fg. - Perhaps it's focus is ... Caroline Wong
- Re: [TruthTalk] John 16:13 fg. - Perhaps it's focus... Terry Clifton
- Re: [TruthTalk] John 16:13 fg. - Perhaps it's f... Caroline Wong
- Re: [TruthTalk] John 16:13 fg. - Perhaps it... Terry Clifton
- Re: [TruthTalk] John 16:13 fg. - Perha... Caroline Wong

