|
Lance, where are you at? IMO you need
help. Maybe a visit to Izzy's husband would
be good for starters and we can go from there. I
continue to wonder how and why
everything DavidM writes seems to get you so
steamed. Where is your peace??
On Sat, 2 Apr 2005 13:09:50 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
There was no ATTACK of any sister in my 'seeing'. There certainly is NO MERIT WHATSOEVER IN PURSUING THIS FURTHER. Get yourself a megaphone and...... From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > John wrote: > > > How many times did I correct Judy prior to my complaint? > > > > Once. > > > > I received Judy's first post with the "comfortable in sin" phrase > on March > > 27, 2005 at 2:57 pm. On March 28, 2005 at 8:19 am, I received a > post from > > you where you declared that Judy had completely rejected the > gospel. You > > said that she had no clue about faith being reckoned as > righteousness and > > that she was ever knowing and never learning. On the same day, I > received > a > > post from Judy at 11:52 am where she explains how she is not > comfortable > > with sin and that something is wrong with the concept of being > comfortable > > in sin. She explained that a person is doubleminded if he thinks > himself > to > > be righteous while at the same time is comfortable with sin. On > 1:01 pm > on > > the same date, I received a post from you where you started to > complain > > about her phrase "comfortable in sin." You declared Judy to be > dishonest > > and to be someone with whom you did not want to continue a > discussion. > > > > John wrote: > > > If you can count to five, you will have a chance at getting the > right > > > answer > > > > Count again, John. > > > > John wrote: > > > Judy Taylor uses three very specific words and in > > > this order "comfortable with sin." Where did she > > > get this specific wording? > > > Hint: from a post I had sent to Terry before Judy stuck > > > her nose into the thread. She is using my very words -- > > > quoting, if you will. > > > > If she was using your very words, then why are you complaining? > She did > not > > use your specific words. She read your phrase about being > comfortable > with > > a person keeping their sin and she abbreviated it to the idea of a > person > > being comfortable with sin and a person being comfortable in sin. > Her > logic > > to do so was fine, but at this point, you felt that your position > was > being > > misrepresented, but more than that, you started accusing her of > misquoting > > you. You keep vascilating back and forth from arguing that she > used your > > very words to arguing that she misquoted you. You can't have it > both > ways, > > John. > > > > John wrote: > > > How many times does one have to ignore and offer > > > correction before the other becomes obvious in his/her > > > offensive behavior? > > > > I'm sure Judy is wondering this the same as I do. How long do we > ignore > and > > offer correction toward you before you become obvious in your > offensive > > behavior? I would say we need to be upfront and speak what is on > our > minds. > > In other words, stop ignoring. Correct in the spirit of love and > meekness. > > > > John wrote: > > > Why has she refused to acknolwdge her "misunderstanding?" > > > I find it nowhere in print. > > > > Because as it has now become clear, she is not misunderstanding. > Judy has > > exposed the deception under which you and Gary are operating. > > > > John wrote: > > > Why have you, David, decided to waste time in dealing > > > with an issue that is of no ultimate merit? > > > > There is ultimate merit in this issue. First, there is the merit > of > > understanding the truth. Second, there is the sister who has > been > attacked > > and deserves some defense when she is in the right. Third, there > is the > > problem of self deception that needs to be exposed in you. > Fourth, > judgment > > comes upon those who bear false witness and offends one of these > little > > ones. Therefore, it behooves us to warn them of their error if > per chance > > God gives them opportunity to repent. > > > > John wrote: > > > I have a right to complain of misrepresentation and > > > misquotation if that is what I think took place. > > > > Of course you do, but if you are shown to be mistaken and you > cannot prove > > that she misquoted you, then you need to apologize for the false > accusation. > > > > John wrote: > > > I have a right to continue in that complaint when the > > > offending person refuses to acknowledge my several > > > explanations. > > > > There should be a limit to how often you continue to complain. At > some > > point, both have spoken their mind. Also, when you are shown to > be in the > > wrong, you should be humble enough and gracious enough to admit > it > > (especially when you are harping about grace so much!). > > > > John wrote: > > > I have (perhaps) a duty to continue the complaint when the > > > offender selects a phrase from my post, divests that phrase > > > from the written and immediate context, and pursues her/his > > > negativity. > > > > You should perhaps consider that you are perpetuating the > negativity by > not > > hearing this dear Christian sister. If you agree with Judy's > > uncomfortableness with sin, then you should be agreeing with her > _expression_ > > of this instead of being offended because she understands your > > comfortableness with the rigtheous keeping their sin as being > abhorrent. > > > > Peace be with you. > > David Miller. > > > > > > ---------- > > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that > you may > know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) > http://www.InnGlory.org > > > > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email > to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you > have a > friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. > > > ---------- > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you > may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) > http://www.InnGlory.org > > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you > have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. > > |
- RE: [TruthTalk] Eternal Judgment Judy Taylor
- RE: [TruthTalk] Eternal Judgment ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] Eternal Judgment Lance Muir
- RE: [TruthTalk] Eternal Judgment ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] Eternal Judgment David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Eternal Judgment Lance Muir
- Re: [TruthTalk] Eternal Judgment David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Eternal Judgment Lance Muir
- Re: [TruthTalk] Eternal Judgment David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Eternal Judgment Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Eternal Judgment Lance Muir

