|
I was. I 'read' his remarks as being playful in a
somewhat uncharacteristically harmful way toward you.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: April 07, 2005 05:05
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow way not "
loving"?
Since I don't play I assumed you were addressing
DaveH - were you?
To whom did you believe me to have been
speaking? What do you think I meant by remark?
Not a kind or loving
remark - especially from one on the liberal/broad
road.
Better to play with a ball of string than a
mouse. The latter reflects something less becoming in you.
Hi DaveH, No Paul Hill did not
represent either God's zeal in our generation or any of the nine
fruit of the Holy Spirit. DAVEH:
??? Are you suggesting PH was not a Christian, Judy?
I assume he was, and that most Protestants accept him as such.
That you below hope his wife and orphan
children who I hope the Church is taking care of., wouldn't
that suggest his Christian leanings? Am I
wrong?
Assuming he was saved (correct me if
I am wrong) in the commonly perceived Christian sense, then did he not
believe he was representing the Lord at the time he set the doctor on
his journey to an eternal physical torture? That seems the
height of eagerness....does it not?
This is why obedience is so
important. God does not use 'lone rangers' like Paul Hill who
take the civil law into their own hands and break the Royal
Law. DAVEH: Hmmmmmm........if I
were a bit more Biblically astute, I'd probably be able to find you
some OT examples of prophets who defied the law of the land to execute
the Royal Law. (Elijah comes to mind....1Kg 18:40)
Under the Old Covenant Israel as a nation
were told at different times to go out and defeat
certain of God's enemies. However, since the cross things have
changed. Now we are told that our enemies are spiritual and so
are our weapons DAVEH:
Hmmmmmm........if you think all your enemies are spiritual, I'd have
to respectfully disagree, Judy. Where did you get that idea?
- God tells us that
"vengeance is His" and that He will repay.
DAVEH: What do you want to bet
that PH thought he was God's executioner......
He is well able to take care of
abortionists.
DAVEH: The Bible is
replete with God instructing his followers to destroy those who
impeded the Lord's work.
In fact I've seen one lady on TV who used
to manage an Abortion Clinic - She has come to the Light,
repented, and is now out there speaking for God; I think
you would agree that this brings Him a whole lot more glory.
DAVEH: To take a passage out of
context, let me quote Jesus........
Now consider that it is
expedient for us, that one man should die for the people, and that the
who nation perish not. Jn 11:50
.........Do you
suppose PH pondered that in concluding God wanted him to save a lot of
babies?
I don't know if Paul Hill cursed ppl
verbally and I don't judge him personally, he was misguided and I've
been there - It's such a sad case - PH may have been well
meaning but the ones left to suffer are his wife
and orphan children who I hope the Church is taking care
of. jt
DAVEH: I don't know if Paul Hill ever said
something to the effect......
I hope you burn in
hell.
...........but who would be surprised if he
did! And.....wouldn't you think he was angry and vengeful? Furthermore, did he
not represent either God's zeal or the fruit
of a Christian life?
Judy Taylor wrote:
In contrast the ppl DaveH speaks of
sound angry and vengeful for personal reasons
so they would not
represent either God's zeal or the
fruit of a Christian life.. judyt
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
|
