The previous similar post was sent while I was trying to get the right "copy." Try it again. JD
In a message dated 4/9/2005 7:31:07 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ACtaully, I found the context -- right there under my nose. While you are pretending that I started the "personal" stuff by referring to my preaching, you domonstrate your own rebellion and stubborness. Look at what you said --
JD: If you actually ever have the privilege of hearing me preach -� you will change your mind about the passivitity and presumption thingy.�
jt: How is what you preach different from the beliefs you have posted on the TT list?���
My point exactly� !!!!!
jt: What is your point JD? Are you a doubleminded man - a Dr. Jekyl and Mr. Hyde?� Do you have one hat for preaching and another for TT?
You equate me talking about my own preaching with you put forth the notion that I am double minded. The redundancy of the question reveals your intent. Plausible denialbilty ("it was only a question, John") will be your defense, no doubt. Transparent and unbelieverable.
Jd
- Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow Way Not Loving - correction Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow Way Not Loving - correction Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow Way Not Loving - correction Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow Way Not Loving - correc... Lance Muir
- RE: [TruthTalk] Narrow Way Not Loving - co... ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow Way Not Loving - correction Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow Way Not Loving - correction Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow Way Not Loving - correction Knpraise

