The previous similar post was sent while I was trying to get the right "copy."   Try it again.  JD

In a message dated 4/9/2005 7:31:07 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



ACtaully, I found the context  -- right there under my nose.   While you are pretending that I started the "personal" stuff by referring to my preaching, you domonstrate your own rebellion and stubborness. Look at what you said  --   


JD: If you actually ever have the privilege of hearing me preach -� you will change your mind about the passivitity and presumption thingy.

jt: How is what you preach different from the beliefs you have posted on the TT list?���

My point exactly� !!!!!

jt: What is your point JD? Are you a doubleminded man - a Dr. Jekyl and Mr. Hyde?� Do you have one hat for preaching and another for TT?




You equate me talking about my own preaching with you put forth the notion that I am double minded.   The redundancy of the question reveals your intent.   Plausible denialbilty  ("it was only a question, John") will be your defense, no doubt.   Transparent and unbelieverable. 

Jd


Reply via email to