Re: [TruthTalk] Hows does this Mormon concept work

[Dave Hansen]

DAVEH:   Yes it is curious, Lance.   And, I will be curious to see if either Kevin or Perry believes that Jesus is not literally the Son of God. Lance Muir wrote: Persons who disagree with us, not surprisingly, tend NOT to discuss/explain to our satisfaction. Curious, isn't it?  ----- Original Message ----- From: Dave Hansen To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: April 11, 2005 10:18 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hows does this Mormon concept work DAVEH:   Whew!   That is a lot of stuff, Perry.  After reading through it though, I find much I'd dispute, starting with....... G-3:  Jesus is clearly not the Son of God in a literal sense, i.e., He was not physically procreated by God ........As you might suspect Perry, I do believe Jesus is clearly and literally, the Son of God.      I also find it curious that the author does not discuss the plural meaning of Elohim, nor does he address some key passages such as Mt 5:48 nor does he discuss to my satisfaction the oneness of God as it applies to man as found in Jn 17:21.  Likewise, he doesn't address the nature of the Godhead very well.  In short, there is a lot I find lacking in this rather lengthy summary. Charles Perry Locke wrote: The mormon jesus is NOT the Jesus of the Bible, the one we Christians worship. Check out this link for details: http://www.equip.org/free/DT160.pdf Perry -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.