'truthtalk' to jt
is philosophical, totally independent of serious theological
inquiry--e.g., goodness (as in the KJVs 'your goodliest men') is only a
(misunderstood) absolute exclusive category the opposite of which is
the category of evil
e.g., the Bible's
'goodness', above, isn't dualistic; there, the
'goodness' pertaining to 'your goodliest men' is a thoughtfully
constructed human conclusion to a comparison of relatively good
men
You don't understand spiritual
reality G and I should know better than to even respond to this by now since
I'm sure that as in the past it will be an exercise in
futility.
What in the world is a "goodly" man? Sounds
like some Shakespearean concept - Jesus said there are none good
but God. He didn't allow ppl to call Him
good. So?
regardless, the
fundamentalist philosophical effect of
dualism upon 'truthtalk' is that one's theology, as
above, may be relatively good, however jt
(arbitrarily) believes that her philosophy is absolutely
good therefore not a smidgen evil like yours--in sum, in her mind,
even y/our relatively good 'theology' is absolutely
evil while never suspecting her philosophical dualism, the darkness
of the angel of light, blinder than a bat 'in the caves of
Shadowland', isn't perfect
First of all my beliefs are not a
'philosophy' (not that this will make one bit of difference to you
G, your grey matter seems to be 'locked in' to certain philosophical
concepts). Secondly why would anyone in good conscience
follow what they believe to be evil?
Even my cat knows better than that. jt
evidence actually suggests that she has
neither..
||
' [..E.g., re: CW] add[ing] a
whole new book to the Word of God.'
Do you have humility in your
theology?
