|
Hi Blaine: The scripture that comes to mind is
Isaiah 8:20 which (to paraphrase) says that doctrine can not conflict with what
has already been revealed in the law and the prophets - baptizing for the dead
certainly isn't part of that. Paul
was referring to something ppl were involved in - he
was not teaching this or making new doctrine. As for
revelation.
My belief is that God reveals to us what has already
been written and noone has as yet even begun to plumb the depths of that.
jt
Judy wrote:
Kevin, can you believe it? It's Blaine who has been reading Augustine on the side and now here he is trying to make a doctrine out of one scripture.. :-) BLAINE: I like your little smilie, Judy. That means you are
trying to be nice, huh? (:>) But seriously, it is a misrepresentation
of the truth to say Joseph Smith manufactured his doctrine of Baptism for the
Dead from the single scripture, 1 Cor.. 15:29. Kevin's analysis of that
particular scripture seems OK by me, but he fails to see the big picture, which
is that the doctrine of Baptism for the Dead came by way of revelation to Joseph
Smith. It is ON-GOING REVELATION that Kevin does not
believe in. His theme is, as always, that revelation ceased with the
apostles' deaths. Can you or Kevin furnish me with any scripture that
substantiates this false--VERY false--doctrine?
"If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to ALL
MEN
liberally . . ." James 1:5 |
- Re: [TruthTalk] Baptism 4 dead? Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Baptism 4 dead? Dave
- [TruthTalk] Revelation David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Baptism 4 dead? Charles Perry Locke
- Re: [TruthTalk] Baptism 4 dead? David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Baptism 4 dead? Charles Perry Locke
- Re: [TruthTalk] Baptism 4 dead? Dave
- Re: [TruthTalk] Baptism 4 dead? Dave
- Re: [TruthTalk] Baptism 4 dead? Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Baptism 4 dead? Dave
- Re: [TruthTalk] Baptism 4 dead? David Miller

