RE: [TruthTalk] Rename: Dresses

[ShieldsFamily]

Judy, she would have like our church where jeans rule. J Izzy   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 11:32 AM To: truthtalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: [TruthTalk] Rename: Dresses   How true, legalism comes in so many shapes and sizes.  When I met my husband's grandmother she was 78yo - had outlived 3 husbands and all four of her children. I have photos of her at the turn of the century in those long frilly dresses they wore back then which must have been so much work. However, by the time I met her she was comfortable in jeans with a flannel long sleeved shirt and an apron and this is all I ever saw her wear.  She was a believer in her own way but would never go to services at Church; she would tell me she was just as good as all those folk up there ... The real reason turned out to be because she wouldn't feel comfortable wearing her britches because their tradition said that females should be in a dress.  What a shame....  judyt   From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Interesting! Still proving that the point of the scripture is that it is not the outward appearance that is important (to wear or not to wear attractive jewelry, outer garments, or fancy hairdos), but the appearance of the inner woman which only God can see.  Usually those who are overly consumed with the outer are neglecting (covering up) the inner. Izzy   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Perry wrote: > Does anyone on on TT know exactly what first > century "dresses" were and what Paul's objections > to them were?   Yes, Perry.  There has been quite a bit of discussion about this so you should not have any trouble researching it.  The Greek word Peter uses is himation, which is exactly the same meaning as our English word himation. This is the outer garment worn by both men and women that primarily functions aesthetically.  In Latin it is the palla for women and pallium for   men.  Search on these words (himation, palla, pallium) and you should be able to find pictures and lots of information.   It is important to note that modesty was NOT the issue here.  Rather, it was   formal dressing.  In modern terms, it would be equivalent to women adorning themselves with that evening gown or prom dress along with make-up, jewelry,   braiding hair and putting it up, etc.  The himation was an outer garment worn over the tunic, so it would be like a man putting on a suit coat over his shirt.  The suit coat is to enhance his outer appearance.  Remove the himation completely, and the woman would not be naked or immodestly dressed anymore than a man would be when he removes his suit jacket.   Peace be with you. David Miller.     ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org   If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.       ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org   If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.