|
Judy, I will be more blunt. It seems to me you
almost never hear a message as a whole. I'm beginning to think your
interlinear responses are a strategy for avoiding making a sustained,
coherent argument. You reduce everything to fragments. This is how you read the
Bible, too, and it destroys meaning. I don't know any other way of describing
the problem. I find it quite demoralizing. When you do write something that
is all one piece, like the one G replied to, it is very hard to make
sense of. I am not interested in answering the denatured fragments. Make what
you will of that. But I think the answer to your question about 1 Cor. 15:50 is
in the verses coming before, especially 35-49 and 51-54. The reason I referred
you to the previous dialogue with David is that the same verses were talked
about there. There are evidently different kinds of bodies. The perishable one
perishes/des, yes, but is raised imperishable. It bears a relationship to the
new one similar to the relation a seed bears to the growing plant.
This is also the answer to your objection about
"reconditioning the old". I agree, we are not going back to the state of Adam,
but our raison d'�tre as humans is and will be what it always was, and we
are being made into humans who are able to fulfill it.
Debbie
|
- Re: [TruthTalk] Rikk Watts on Genesis 1 Debbie Sawczak
- Re: [TruthTalk] Rikk Watts on Genesis 1 Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Rikk Watts on Genesis 1 Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Rikk Watts on Genesis 1 Debbie Sawczak
- [TruthTalk] Rikk Watts on Genesis 1 Judy Taylor
- [TruthTalk] Rikk Watts on Genesis 1 Judy Taylor

