|
Caroline, you are exactly right.
Grace is what "earns" us a place at the table--the sacrifice of
Christ paid for the ticket to the party. We can't "deserve"
anything except hell but for His grace. Thus being intellectually honest,
or sincere, or belonging to a large group who believes as we do, or walking in
what we discern as the "light" if it is not what God says is light,
none of these things will earn us a place at the table.* However, you seem to think there are no
requirements for that grace. Do you think everyone will receive it? I believe
that only those who repent and follow Christ will receive it. Those who
are not old enough to do that will not be required to do so, of course.
God is not only just, but fair. Izzy *Rev 19: 7"Let us rejoice and be glad and give the glory to Him, for the
marriage of the Lamb has come and His bride has made herself ready." 8 It was given
to her to clothe herself in fine linen, bright and clean; for the fine linen
is the righteous acts of the saints. 9Then he
said to me, "Write, 'Blessed are those who are invited to the marriage
supper of the Lamb '" And he said to me, "These are true words of
God." -----Original Message----- Actually, I was reacting to your phrase "deserving a place at
God's table". I come from a tradition that says it is by grace we are all
there and I used to think all Christians believed same. None of us deserves to
be there. It still startles me whenever I read various versions of "we got
there the old fashioned way - we earned it." :-)But I'm getting used to
it! But your comment has opened up another avenue of conversation. What if
someone thought they were following Christ with all that they are but their
theology is wrong so their fruit is a little strange? Would God look into their
heart and accept them anyway? What is of more importance - the believer's
theology or the believer's heart? Also, what about children who die before they can become Christian?
What if they were born into non-Christian families? Would God make an exception
for them? Love, Caroline > > From: "ShieldsFamily" < > Date: 2005/05/06 Fri AM 08:48:22 EST > To: < > Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1 > > Caroline, No, that is not what you wrote below. We can only
take a person's > word for whether or not they are following Jesus with all their
heart and > mind and strength, but God sees the heart. We can only see
the fruit, and > sometimes that contradicts what comes out of their mouth.
Izzy > > > > _____ > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Caroline
Wong > Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 6:49 AM > To: > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1 > > > > uhhh....didn't I say we were all following Jesus with our hearts
and minds? > But I'm glad to hear you withhold judgment...sort of withhold > judgment....whatever....it's a start. > > > > Love, > > > > Caroline > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: ShieldsFamily <mailto: > > To: > > Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 9:05 PM > > Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1 > > > > Caroline, None of what you stated are God's criteria for deserving
a place > at Gods table. There is plenty of room at the table, but
only for those who > have chosen to follow Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. I
can't tell you if > you qualify or not. You tell me. Izzy > > > > > _____ > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Caroline
Wong > Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 8:40 PM > To: > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1 > > > > We both are intellectually honest and sincere in our pursuit of
the faith. > We each go by the light of our understanding. We stand in the
company of > hundreds who believe and practice just as we do. There is room at
the Lord's > table for all of us, isn't there? > > > > Love, > > > > Caroline > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: ShieldsFamily <mailto: > > To: > > Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 8:15 AM > > Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1 > > > > I disagree rationally. Izzy > > > > > _____ > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Caroline
Wong > Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 7:34 PM > To: > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1 > > > > Indeed you would be if you disagreed rationally with what I wrote.
If you > disagreed emotionally, then it's another matter altogether. > > > > Love, > > > > Caroline > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: ShieldsFamily <mailto: > > To: > > Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 12:46 PM > > Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1 > > > > Caroline, I can't really agree with most of what you have
said. So maybe > I'm just being intellectually honest with you? Izzy > > > > > _____ > > > > > I thought, surely Izzy jests! which is why I replied in kind. > saying the bible isn't true or looking for reasons to not take it
literally. > Believing the bible is literal is the simplest approach and
Occam's razor > favours the simplest approach. The only reason theologians abandon
it is > because they could not be intellectually honest and take it
literally or > pretend that things like language, culture, myth etc. does not
matter. > > > > That's why I say it was merely intelligence. We know Proverbs is a > collection of wise sayings but not literal promises we get to hold
God to. > We know Psalms is > said against their enemies and that we're not allowed to pray or
think same > way because of the new command Jesus gave us to love our enemies.
Even the > Chicago Statement of very conservative inerrancy acknowledge the
presence of > hyperbole in Jesus' statements and also that inerrancy does not
apply to any > translation. > > > > Approaching the bible as truth in history, poetry, wisdom
literature, > biography and prophecy does not hurt a person's faith or
relationship with > God. It makes both stronger and richer. It is the product of our
scientific > age that we've understand truth only as scientific or mathematical
and lost > the beauty of truth in other forms. > > > > Love, > > > > Caroline > > > ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that
you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to |
- RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1 ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1 ttxpress
- Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1 Kevin Deegan
- RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1 ShieldsFamily
- Re: [Bulk] RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesi... Lance Muir
- RE: [Bulk] RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Ge... ShieldsFamily
- RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1 Kevin Deegan
- RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1 ShieldsFamily
- Re: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1 caroline
- Re: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1 ShieldsFamily
- Re: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1 Caroline Wong
- Re: [Bulk] Re: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts o... Lance Muir
- Re: [Bulk] Re: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Wat... Terry Clifton
- Re: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1 Kevin Deegan
- Re: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genes... Caroline Wong
- RE: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on ... ShieldsFamily
- Re: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts... Caroline Wong
- Re: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts... Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on ... Terry Clifton
- Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on ... Caroline Wong

