I don’t “dislike” JD and LDS theology.  I just realize it is an affront to the Lord and sends those who believe in it to hell, and therefore have no interest in discussing anything about it.  I do discuss theology here on TT to some extent, but don’t care to split hairs over non-essentials, or get puffed up about any of it.  So I guess I don’t understand your question.  I’m glad you are here, however, DaveH.  Izzy

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2005 11:36 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] baptism

 

DAVEH:  I understand your dislike of JS and LDS theology, Izzy.  But I don't understand your reluctance to discuss Christian theology.  Why belong to TT if you don't want to discuss such things?

    As for me discussing LDS stuff....that's not why I'm here.  Everybody seems to think that is what I am here for, despite my explanation to the contrary.

ShieldsFamily wrote:

Okay—good!  Well, guess what.  JS was a total fraud.  Are you willing to accept the evidence when it is presented by those on TT? I don’t discuss Mormon theology. It’s like discussing Star Trek—I’m just not into sci-fi.   Izzy

 


DAVEH:  I like your answer, Izzy.....Of course not. (duh.)



     BTW.....I am curious---why do you not want to discuss theology?

ShieldsFamily wrote:

No.  But I would like to know your answer.  Izzy



 

DAVEH:  Do you want to discuss theology, Izzy?

ShieldsFamily wrote:

DaveH, I’m just wondering something.  What if you were given absolute proof that J.Smith was a fraud? Would you still choose to believe in Mormonism? Izzy

 



-- 
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Dave Hansen
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.langlitz.com
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 If you wish to receive
 things I find interesting,
 I maintain six email lists...
 JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
 STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
 




Reply via email to