DAVEH:  What I find interesting is that IF Kevin does not feel comfortable with being an anti-Mormon, then with what label would he be comfortable?....Certainly not pro-Mormon!

    Hmmmmmmm........I suppose that is why Jesus was crucified.   His detractors believed he was anti-Christian (so to speak), and hence won the battle in the short term.  But there will be another judgment that will supersede the first one.

Lance Muir wrote:
Dave:IFF 'orthodoxy' has any intrinsic meaning whatsoever then, you are not.
This consideration might be based alone on the answer to the question posed
by Jesus Himself: 'Who do people say that I am?' This could not but place
you, and 'yours', in the camp of anti-orthodox Given this, I would not
consider your anti-christian (in the sense of 'orthodox') posts to be in any
way slanderous any more than I would a Muslim who proceded to speak of Jesus
out of his Koranic understanding.

It is IMO possible to preach an anti-christ message and live a genuinely
christian life.(We all do). This being said You know how it works - those
who win the war get to hold war crimes trials.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: May 08, 2005 11:12
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Dispersions


  
DAVEH:  I don't quite understand why you or Kevin would consider my
questioning you about whether or not your attacking Mormonism would make
you an anti-Mormon.  Isn't that simply the definition of an
anti-Mormon?  And doesn't it accurately describe both you and Kevin?

    If that is true, then why would either of you consider it
    
slanderous???
  
    Perhaps I should ask the TT moderator(s).....Have I hurt the
reputation of either Kevin or Perry in anything I've posted to or about
them?

Charles Perry Locke wrote:

    
      
From: Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kevin Deegan wrote:

        
 Do you agree with slandering someone?
          
DAVEH:  I wonder if Perry thinks I've been trying to slander
him......Perry???
        
I did not think of the term "slander" at the time. But come to think
of it, using politically charged labels and questions and indefinites
to hide labels is somewhat slanderous. But, I try to look beyond the
words at the reason or meaning they were offered. And, knowing who is
behind your belief explains it to me. There are reasons for your
choosing those words in response to my attack against satan.

Eph 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against
principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of
this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

Perry

      
--

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.

Reply via email to