You are very perceptive, I am a very sensitive guy : )
I have no problems with labels a wear a few.
I do have a problem when it is a manuever to discredit the messenger without dealing with the issues.
By the way I believe most of the labels I have posted are of a theological bent (liberal) not such as emotional (ANGRY) or psychological (mental)
So if Perry is ANTI Mormon then you qualify on the same grounds as ANTI Christian!
Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kevin Deegan wrote:DAVEH: Yoweeeeee! For a guy who is sensitive about being labeled an anti-Mormon, you apparently don't have any compunctions about labeling other TTers! :-)DAVEH Perhaps I should ask the TT moderator(s).....Don't bother asking the liberals
DAVEH: Don't you know you are supposed to use a smiley when you are being silly, Kevin! :-)DAVEH: I don't quite understand why you or Kevin would consider my questioning you about whether or not your attacking Mormonism would make you an anti-Mormon. Isn't that simply the definition of an anti-Mormon? And doesn't it accurately describe both you and Kevin?Well then that settles it, you are a ANTI-Christian!
BTW....To repeat what a perceptive TTer recently posted.....Why not deal with the actual issues......Unless you are trying to discredit the messenger.DAVEH: I don't quite understand why you or Kevin would consider my
questioning you about whether or not your attacking Mormonism would make
you an anti-Mormon. Isn't that simply the definition of an
anti-Mormon? And doesn't it accurately describe both you and Kevin?
If that is true, then why would either of you consider it slanderous???
Perhaps I should ask the TT moderator(s).....Have I hurt the
reputation of either Kevin or Perry in anything I've posted to or about
them?
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
>
>
>> From: Dave
>> Kevin Deegan wrote:
>>
>>> Do you agree with slandering someone?
>>
>>
>> DAVEH: I wonder if Perry thinks I've been trying to slander
>> him......Perry???
>
>
> I did not think of the term "sl ander" at the time. But come to think
> of it, using politically charged labels and questions and indefinites
> to hide labels is somewhat slanderous. But, I try to look beyond the
> words at the reason or meaning they were offered. And, knowing who is
> behind your belief explains it to me. There are reasons for your
> choosing those words in response to my attack against satan.
>
> Eph 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against
> principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of
> this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
>
> Perry
>-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
Discover Yahoo!
Use Yahoo! to plan a weekend, have fun online & more. Check it out!
