Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1

[Debbie Sawczak]

Izzy's stance below is an attempt to have one's cake and eat it too: to live by a system in which all truth claims must be submitted to the criterion of "proof" while at the same time exercising, about this particular truth claim, a confidence that is independent of proof.   I suppose the dualism (in both contexts you mention) is dividing knowledge up into two discrete kinds. (Am I understanding you, G?)   Kevin's question about "any historical figure" is relevant.   Debbie   ----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 6:14 PM Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1 where's BillT? someone ask him, pls, to weigh in here, with JD and Lance, too, partic on the relationship betw dualism and circular reasoning in the IS context, below--or, perhaps, in the Am post-modern (pseudo-)rational experience          g :: tt moderator   On Mon, 9 May 2005 15:44:28 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: spun from the perfect circularity   On Mon, 9 May 2005 09:24:46 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Of course I would stop believing in Jesus if someone could prove He was false.  Of course, no one ever will. Izzy