|
Izzy's stance below is an
attempt to have one's cake and eat it too: to live by a system in which all truth claims must be
submitted to the criterion of "proof" while at the same
time exercising, about this particular truth claim, a confidence that is
independent of proof. Debbie Where’d you get that assumption,
Debbie? My stance is no such thing—that is only your inference.
I never required “proof” to believe, and don’t require “proof”
to continue to believe. But, since you were the one to ask the question,
if you COULD prove to me that Jesus wasn’t “real” I would have
to no longer believe in Him, or live in total denial of actual proof. That
isn’t faith; it’s insanity. Faith triumphs over doubt—not over
actual reality. I can have all the faith in the world that the gravity
doesn’t exist, but that doesn’t get me anywhere. If God could
be proven to not exist (I have a hard time even writing something so
ridiculous) it would be foolish to continue to believe, as there would be no
possible purpose or reward for it. Perhaps you have decided ahead of time to
believe in spite of real proof to the contrary because you think it is possible
that He can actually be proven untrue? I have no fear of it, and don’t go
seeking after proof for that reason—I need no reassurance that Jesus is
the Way the Truth and the Life. He is my every breath. Izzy |
- Re: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] Proof of Jesus? ShieldsFamily
- Re: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] Proof of Jesus? Lance Muir
- Re: [TruthTalk] Proof of Jesus? Debbie Sawczak
- Re: [TruthTalk] Proof of Jesus? Debbie Sawczak
- RE: [TruthTalk] Proof of Jesus? ShieldsFamily
- Re: [Bulk] RE: [TruthTalk] Proof of Jesus? Lance Muir
- RE: [Bulk] RE: [TruthTalk] Proof of J... ShieldsFamily
- RE: [TruthTalk] Proof of Jesus? ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] Proof of Jesus? Judy Taylor
- RE: [TruthTalk] Proof of Jesus? ShieldsFamily
- Re: [Bulk] RE: [TruthTalk] Proof of Jesus? Lance Muir

