Judy, might I just gently point out that you have often used the argument "such-and-such-a-word is never used in the Bible" against other people's positions. Your first paragraph below should end put an end to that approach, I think.
 
Not that we aren't all embarrassingly inconsistent!
 
Debbie
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Dispersions

 
 
On Wed, 11 May 2005 00:27:44 -0700 Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Yeah, I do believe creeds such as the Trinity Doctrine are wrong.....as it obfuscates the nature of God.  And, if all the professors of religion at the time of JS subscribed to errant creeds such as the T-Doctrine, then that would make them corrupted as well.
 
I know there is no such word as "Trinity" in scripture DaveH - ATST the concept is there from Genesis on.
You can see it at the beginning, during the Creation when the Father had the thought, the Word spoke it
into being and the Spirit brought it to pass.  Same at Jesus' baptism in the Jordan, all three manifestations
were there then.  The Son (Word) in the water, the Father speaking from heaven and the Spirit descending
like a dove.  So in what way does this concept obfuscate the nature of God?

    As for the problems mentioned about the Bible, IF there were no possibility of men adding to, or taking away from it....then there would have been no need for the Lord to warn against such.  Furthermore, it is quite obvious that such has actually happened, if one compares the various translations, and looks at how and what the Bible refers to certain things.  Furthermore, lacking a knowledge of specific details not found in the Bible, men have created doctrines based on their assumptions, rather than actually Biblical practice.  So it does seem logical that their is a fair amount of gospel information not contained in the Bible. 
 
Yes there are a lot of voices out there and none are without signification - However, there is only one voice
of truth so we need to take heed how we hear.
 
 Does that make me anti-Christian for suggesting such?....not in my opinion.  What it makes me is someone willing to view Christianity from a common sense standpoint rather than dogmatically adhering to an unfounded assumption that ALL God wants us to know is found in the Bible, as some TTers have proposed recently....to wit, you and Perry, if memory serves correctly.
 
Not unfounded and not assumption - in fact Jesus saw things the same way.  He told Israel that all they needed to know were in Moses and the Prophets and if they did not believe them, then they would not believe him either..

    Again Kevin, I must respectfully disagree with you....I do not consider my beliefs to be anti-Christian.  As with others, I simply believe your view of Christianity is in error.
 
Your beliefs are anti-Christian Dave, not only do they violate the Truth, you hold to them rather than Truth; but as the old saying goes "A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still"
 
I don't believe you are willing to see anything other than what you are holding on to, at least not yet.   jt



Reply via email to