Nor do I understand why you think it is politically motivated. I think you are reading much more into this than is logical to assume. By labeling you and Kevin as anti-Mormon, what political effects, benefits or motivations do you see it having in TT? Do you think it is going to sway other TTers one way or another from what they currently believe? Just what do you perceive the political fallout to be?
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
From: Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
LDS folks did coin the anti-Mormon term, and subsequently defined it in effect as one who actively preaches against and denigrates LDS theology
Right so it is a defense/deflection mechanism to label those that are engaged in any form of criticism of the church in an attempt to dismiss ALL the Criticism since they are just ANTI's
Like I said before, it's use is politically motivated. Also, Dave, you said "That I would disagree or even argue that another's Christian based theology is misguided would not make me an anti-Christian". That is a double standard to say that I am "anti-mormon" because I "disagree or even argue that another's Christian based theology is misguided".
Perry
-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
