|
Charles Perry Locke wrote: Dave,DAVEH: Perry....it doesn't matter what answer I give you....you won't find it reasonable. You've made it quite clear that even a truth spoken from the lips of a Mormon is to be abused. For what possible reason do you need to have an answer that seems reasonable, Perry. Look at it logically...You believe LDS theology is wrong. So why do you waste your time trying to understand it? Your previous attitude has been to attack anything emanating from Mormonism, even if it is true. So...I can explain my beliefs to you in detail, but your attitude towards them (and me) will remain the same, will it not? You cannot conceive that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is as we claim, the True Church....so why would you possibly want to know how I resolve conflicts of beliefs that you perceive to be false. As I see it, there are two possible reasons for you to ask such a question knowing that you wouldn't agree with the answer. If you have a similar curiosity as I do to why people believe as they do, then you might want to know what is there about Mormonism that attracts people or why Mormons tend to be so committed to their peculiar beliefs. On the other hand, if you firmly believe Satan is at the heart of Mormonism, why would you even entertain such a curiosity. From your recent posts, I would dare say the latter is most likely, which leads to the second reason. You have in effect proclaimed Mormonism to be evil, and are on a crusade to denigrate it every time it is presented in a positive light. So, why do you..... want to see if you have an answer I can find REASONABLE .......unless it is to find some some weakness in my beliefs, faith or psyche in which to attack....attack....attack, hoping I'll succumb to mocking, humiliation, peer pressure or whatever. If you don't like Mormonism, Perry....that is your problem. Just don't expect me to allow you to make it my problem. Am I accurately portraying your position, Perry? or if you will use of smoke, mirrors, and prooftexts to explain it away, or if you will sidestep the issue. These are the three types of responses I have seen you provide for various discussions and questions in the past.DAVEH: Believe what you want, Perry. I feel pretty comfortable in my understanding of what you perceive as a dilemma. I certainly don't have all the answers to each and every question you or Kevin might pose, but I don't let it worry me much. Perhaps what I lack in knowledge, I make up in faith. Furthermore, I feel so old and tired, I don't have much gumption to fight younger guys like you and Kevin. If you want to rule the sandbox...be my guest. I'll go find my own sandbox and take a nap. :-)
-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS. |
- Re: [TruthTalk] Dave uses Socratic Method of Teaching ... Dave
- Re: [TruthTalk] Dave uses Socratic Method of Teac... Charles Perry Locke
- Re: [TruthTalk] Dave uses Socratic Method of Teac... Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Dave uses Socratic Method of Teac... David Miller
- RE: [TruthTalk] Dave uses Socratic Method of ... ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] Dave uses Socratic Method... knpraise
- RE: [TruthTalk] Dave uses Socratic Me... ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] Dave uses Socrat... knpraise
- RE: [TruthTalk] Dave uses So... ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] Dave uses Socratic Method... Dave Hansen
- [TruthTalk] mormon angels. was: Dave ... Charles Perry Locke

