Dave,

I wanted to add that, although you are whining about answerig my question, and doing everything except answering it, it has served it's secondary purpose, and that is to expose and stimulate discussion on the non-biblical and heretical aspects of mormon beliefs. In the meantime, my question has also been answered to my satisfaction by Kevin.

Perry

From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] mormon angels. was: Dave uses Socratic Method of Teaching LDS doctrine on TT
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 23:29:27 -0700

DAVEH: For what reason should I explain why/where you are wrong about my beliefs, Perry. I don't mind explaining to those who really want to know what I believe, but in your case it seems your intention is to denigrate my beliefs.

You've stated that your mission (so to speak) is to discredit Mormonism.....in effect meeting the definition of an anti-Mormon. So for what reason would you want to query me about Mormonism, if it is not to denigrate that in which I believe?

Along with that, you continue to disbelieve my stated reason for joining TT years ago. You can believe as you wish, Perry....but if you effectively want to post that I am lying about my reasons for being here, then I see no particular reason to hand you the knife with which you intend to use to carve up my faith.

Charles Perry Locke wrote:

Actually, the problem I have is not with Dave stating mormon beliefs, especially when asked. It is his teaching mormon doctrines, but denying that he is doing so. I am for openest...but honesty, too.

Dave,

If I am "somewhat close", can you tell me the part I am wrong about? You always say if I want to know what mormons believe, ask a mormon...

Perry

From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] mormon angels. was: Dave uses Socratic Method of Teaching LDS doctrine on TT
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 06:38:17 -0700



Charles Perry Locke wrote:

Dave,

Christians consider angels and humans to be two distinct types of created beings.


DAVEH: Yes, I understand that. Yet, it seems Paul is telling us that it is difficult (if not impossible) to tell us (mortals) apart from angels.

Correct me if I am wrong, but don't mormons consider angels to be either pre-mortal or post-mortal humans? For example, don't mormons consider Michael (the archangel) also to have been a human at one point...was it Adam? Hasn't he also been considered to be the mormon god the father? So, basically, one being can be spirit, angel, human, or god at various times. Am I right on this?


DAVEH:  You are somewhat close.


Perry


--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.


----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to