So do I.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Christine Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: May 25, 2005 14:42
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] mormon angels. was:
Dave uses Socratic Method of Teaching LDS doctrine on TT


> Yes, I do see your point and I do agree. But the Bible
> speaks to be understood, and it is written to inform
> us. We must interpret, that's true, just as I must
> interpret your post when I read it.
>
> The Bible is very clear on what it means to be a child
> of God and a brother of Jesus. It requires
> interpretation to communicate at all, but when
> something is stated blankly (John 1:12), how much spin
> can we add before we are misinterpreting? Perhaps I
> could have said "misinterpret" instead of "disregard,"
> but I do believe the Mormons are genuinely ignoring
> the Bible's stance on this one.
>
> Blessings!
>
> --- Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Christine:Please! One need not disregard the Bible
> > to believe anything. One
> > need only disregard your interpretation. What you
> > find to be the plain
> > meaning of something is not necessarily what another
> > thoughtful believe
> > might find. Agreed?
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Christine Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: May 25, 2005 13:36
> > Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] mormon
> > angels. was: Dave uses
> > Socratic Method of Teaching LDS doctrine on TT
> >
> >
> > >
> >
> http://www.towertotruth.net/Mormon/witnessing/terminology.htm
> > >
> > > What a wakeup call. I followed this link and found
> > > this:
> > >
> > > JESUS CHRIST:
> > >
> > > LDS--A created being, the first spirit child of
> > Elohim
> > > and one of his wives, the spirit brother of
> > Lucifer
> > > the devil.
> > >
> > > So Jesus and Satan are BROTHERS? I thought Jesus
> > was
> > > my brother: Romans 8:29, "For whom he did
> > foreknow, he
> > > also did predestinate to be conformed to the image
> > of
> > > his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many
> > > brethren." Paul is clearly talking about our
> > adoption
> > > by God the Father, who becomes our Father when we
> > > "receive" His son (John 1:12) when he says earlier
> > in
> > > verse 19: "For as many as are led by the Spirit of
> > > God, they are the sons of God." Lucifer is not led
> > by
> > > God's Spirit. He is engages in warfare against
> > God's
> > > Spirit. And he certainly has not received Jesus.
> > >
> > > To believe these things, one must first disregard
> > the
> > > Bible.
> > >
> > > Blessings,
> > >
> > > Christine
> > >
> > > --- Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > There was a significant word game going on when
> > I
> > > > first arrived on this forum. LDS using words
> > that
> > > > seemed intended to cloak the true LDS
> > understanding.
> > > > I think the christians here have a far better
> > > > understanding of mormonism now then in past
> > years
> > > >
> > > > There are words that are familiar to christians
> > that
> > > > have a different meaning to LDS
> > > > Word   Christian      LDS meaning
> > > > Gentile NON Jew - NON LDS
> > > > angel  created spirit being  - ressurected man
> > > > Virgin birth
> > > > Gospel
> > > > Fall bad -good
> > > > Jesus Christ
> > > > Godhead Trinity - committee composed of gods
> > > > including SATAN
> > > > council in heaven - The meeting in the premortal
> > > > life of the Godhead and spirits designated for
> > this
> > > > earth, in which the plan of salvation was
> > presented.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.lightplanet.com/mormons/basic/premortal/Council_EOM.htm
> > > > At a certain point in the council, the Father
> > asked,
> > > > "Whom shall I send [as the Redeemer]?" Jesus
> > Christ,
> > > > known then as the great I AM and as Jehovah,
> > > > answered, "Here am I, send me," and agreed to
> > follow
> > > > the Father's plan (Moses 4:1-4; Abr. 3:27). As a
> > > > counter-measure, Lucifer offered himself and an
> > > > amendment to the Father's plan of saving mankind
> > > > that would not respect their agency
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.towertotruth.net/Mormon/witnessing/terminology.htm
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Charles Perry Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > David, Dave is smarter than you are giving him
> > > > credit for being. He knows
> > > > what he is doing. He is playing a word game. I
> > have
> > > > no problem with him
> > > > pushing his mormon views into the discussions
> > > > here...I just want him to
> > > > acknowledge that is what he is doing. He is
> > > > intentionally misinterpreting
> > > > this as my not wanting him to espouse mormonism
> > on
> > > > the forum. That is NOT my
> > > > goal. My goal is to get him to own his actions.
> > To
> > > > say he is NOT pushing
> > > > mormonism, then push it anyway is disengenuous.
> > > > Then, to turn it around as
> > > > though I do not welcome his mormon views is a
> > lie.
> > > >
> > > > Perry
> > > >
> > > > >From: "David Miller"
> > > > >Reply-To: [email protected]
> > > > >To:
> > > > >Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] mormon
> > angels.
> > > > was: Dave uses Socratic
> > > > >Method of Teaching LDS doctrine on TT
> > > > >Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 09:09:31 -0400
> > > > >
> > > > >DaveH wrote:
> > > > > > Apparently many TTers want me to teach LDS
> > > > theology on
> > > > > > TT, yet some wish to criticize me for
> > complying
> > > > with their wishes.
> > > > > > Seems like a no win situation, eh Lance.
> > > > >
> > > > >Let me clarify yet again what TruthTalk is all
> > > > about and Dave Hansen's
> > > > >situation in regards to this forum.
> > > > >
> > > > >TruthTalk is meant to be a forum where people
> > from
> > > > different religions and
> > > > >different backgrounds can share their beliefs
> > and
> > > > teachings with the rest
> > > > >of
> > > > >us. We, in turn, can judge what they teach and
> > > > examine it. We can raise
> > > > >objections or questions concerning what is
> > being
> > > > said. The goal is
> > > > >learning
> > > > >and getting a better undertanding of both what
> > we
> > > > believe and what others
> > > > >believe.
> > > > >
> > > > >Dave Hansen is LDS Mormon and he has as much
> > right
> > > > here as anybody else to
> > > > >teach or post his views. In like manner, his
> > > > teachings will be examined
> > > > >and
> > > > >questioned by others. This is the nature of the
> > > > forum. I would not say
> > > > >that it is a "no win situation" just because a
> > > > person's viewpoint is
> > > > >criticized in this forum. If you share your
> > views,
> > > > expect some examination
> > > > >and perhaps criticism if someone thinks that
> > the
> > > > viewpoint deserves such.
> > > > >
> > > > >Now in regards to the question of why DaveH is
> > > > here. I have read both Dave
> > > > >and Perry's exchange on this, and personally I
> > find
> > > > Dave's reasons for
> > > > >being
> > > > >here consistent. He has an interest in knowing
> > what
> > > > Protestants believe
> > > > >and
> > > > >why. He interacts with us, and in doing so, is
> > > > questioned about his
> > > > >beliefs. He responds to such questions in a way
> >
> === message truncated ===
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
>


----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to