|
For a mature believer "being ticked off" is no reason
for lack of love and/or rudeness. It's possible Slade may
have misunderstood some things; I know he had no idea
what I was talking about most of the time. The
answer to his predicament would have been to say
goodbye and quietly retire into his studies and home life.
The way he acted did not exhibit one bit of
grace. jt
I do believe that Slade was more than a little
ticked off with David and, understandably so IMO.
I don't think it funny Lance; I think it is
extremely rude, to listmembers and most expecially to the
listowner
with whom he had some kind of an agreement which
was broken and nullified and that without notice. If
nothing else he broke the Royal Law - Love
which I am sure would have an equivalent in the Talmud.
jt
Was that an 'unintended funny'? 'broken one
of the Talmudic laws'. Good one, Judith!
You can't know the
heart Lance other than what proceeds from the mouth and by their own
admission this is
how they (Slade and Kay) perceived the
way God would have them walk even though it is far from NT
Christianity.
I believe they were both well meaning but to
this day can not comprehend why Slade would
take on moderation
of this list with so much on his plate ie
work, study, 8 children at home and a
part time working wife. I was not
surprised at his abrupt exit, only by the way
they left with noone sure whether or not they were sad, glad, or
mad - All we were sure of was that they
were gone... That had to have broken one or more of the
Talmudic
Laws. jt
I've recently been in touch with Slade
via Kay. You misspeak, methinks, Judith. You do so not vis a vis the
Talmudic reference but as to his non legalistic heart. I watched him
as a moderator.As to the Millers deux, I have naught against
either.
From: Judy Taylor Not so. Slade was more legalistic than David
Miller by a long shot; anyone who tries to keep the 10 Commandments by
observing the 613 man made laws of the Talmud IMO is excessively
legalistic. How is it your comprehension is so partial Lance? Methinks you show a definite
negative bias toward both DM and his sweet daughter Christine.
jt
David: Would you care to tell us, as
list administrator, why you believe that the last two moderators,
Gary and Slade, bit the dust? Both, by the by, were non-legalists
were they not?
Ok, guys, this makes it clear that a new moderator is in
order. For some reason, Gary won't correspond with me, so
I am taking action unilaterally for the sake of the list.
Perry has agreed to take over as moderator again. I
appreciate the time Gary has put into the job. The job is
now Perry's.
The idea of a moderator is that he is the only person who
will be speaking toward the person on the list. He will
try to help the rest of us stay on topic and stay away from
personal attacks. Let's please comply with his
judgments. Thanks.
David Miller
List Administrator
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, May 27,
2005 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re:
[Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Fond Farewells- Salvation
Apparently. -----Original
Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
[email protected]Sent:
Fri, 27 May 2005 22:18:56 EDT Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re:
[Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Fond Farewells- Salvation
In a message dated 5/27/2005 7:55:41 PM Mountain Standard
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes: What was your message to Deegan when he
called me a liar? Liar is ok -- nuts is off
limits?
Blaine: I think Kevin has arrived at the
"can-do-no-wrong" stage of membership in TT.
:>)
|
