Oh, yeah. One for you. Dozens for JD. Izzy -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Perry Locke Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 10:40 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Exerpts
Actually, Izzy, it was not that long ago that Dave and I were having just such a squabble. Perry >From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [email protected] >To: <[email protected]> >Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Exerpts >Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 11:30:56 -0500 > >JD why is it that you are the ONE individual who is in constant >quibbles about "I didn't say that," "Yes I did," "You said thus and >such," "You are lying about what I said," "Prove that I said that,", >etc, etc, etc. Ever notice that no one else has these squabbles except >for you? Does this tell you anything??? Izzy > > _____ > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 6:56 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts > > >Wrong again. The words, below, are your original post, Judy. The post >preeceding this one has me talking about something else and you dragging >Lance and Gary's names into the subject. I question you on this, >wondering >why you have included them in your response when I had not refereneced >them at all, and this "origianl post" is your defence of that strange occurance. >THIS IS THE ORIGINAL. Eventually, my response to your false accusations >was to cite Lance's several posts proving that his concerns in script >included much much more than comments about the movies. > >JD > >-----Original Message----- >From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [email protected] >Cc: [email protected] >Sent: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 03:49:21 -0400 >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts > > >This is not the original - this is me explaining the original. You'll >have to do better than this... jt > >On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 22:04:55 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ><javascript:parent.ComposeTo('[EMAIL PROTECTED]');> writes: > > >Here is your original post, Mrs Taylor. I am the one who spoke of rooting >and grounding -- not you. but you can read it for yourself. >Gary & Lance are referenced in my wording not yours because they are >two of the three who are most critical of David Miller and his spiritual gift. >I'd >be interested in some examples of the rooting and grounding (in God's >Word) that you perceive in the writings of both Lance and Gary JD. >Lance is an expert in old movies and this is what he writes about. Gary >is taken up with his own writings, those of Bob Dylan, and the word >"myth" ... So how about >giving me some examples of what I have missed. jt > >And here is what you said you said: >Let me repeat; in my original post on this subject Mr. Smithson I said >that neither Lance nor Gary were sufficiently rooted and grounded in >God's Word to correctly discern a genuine spiritual gift in operation. >Look in the archives. This is what I said. jt > >Not having a good week, are we? >JD > > > >From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] ><javascript:parent.ComposeTo('[EMAIL PROTECTED]');> > > >Let me repeat; in my original post on this subject Mr. Smithson I said >that neither Lance nor Gary were sufficiently rooted and grounded in >God's Word to correctly discern a genuine spiritual gift in operation. >Look in the archives. This is what I said. jt > >On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 16:34:04 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > In your first post on this subject, you did not say that at all, Mrs. >Taylor. Not even close. >But your side does not care what it has written -- only what it says >it has >written. Let's move on. >Jd > > >That is your myth (read lie) JD because I never made a statement >anything like what you have written below. Did I say Gary O never reads the Bible? >What I said is that he is not sufficiently rooted and grounded in God's >Word to discern what is and what is not a genuine spiritual gift in >operation. >Actually I suspect he >would say they are all bogus because of the fact that he is Calvinistic >at heart. jt > >On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 18:01:59 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >myth (read:lie) : Gary O has no relationship with the Word of God > >JD > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Isaiah's point about false worship solidifies in ch2, relates to >'trusting in man'; in ch5, Isaiah condemns the arrogant attitude/s of >God's people; e.g., '..you live alone in the land' (5:8), a criticism >of their economics which reflects their real poverty (lording >themselves over the poor)..apparently such poverty results primarily >from man-centeredness witnessed in the philosophy partic of the/ir religious establishment (cp. >3:12, 14); also, 5:14 does not mention 'hell'--its about a blessed >society trapped in the throes of (its) spiritual suicide > >On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 23:44:34 -0400 Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >writes: > >. read ..Isaiah 5:13,14 > > > > _____ > >Discover Yahoo! >Find restaurants, movies, travel & more fun for the weekend. Check it out! ><http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=32658/*http://discover.yahoo.com/weekend.ht >ml> > > > > ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
