To:CPL-Have you ever SERIOUSLY CONSIDERED that Blaine's 'belief' might be
quite true and, that your's might be quite false? I'm not attempting to be
funny!

Why not address my post concerning 'belief systems'.?


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: June 13, 2005 10:22
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah


> Blaine, sorry about the typo...sometimes I transpose letters
> unintentionally.
>
> Transmitters, receivers, whatever. Are you willing to admit  that since
> there is no real evidence, then it is possible that the Isaiah scripture
is
> not related to the anecdote?
>
> Perry, AE6GQ
>
>
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Reply-To: [email protected]
> >To: [email protected]
> >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
> >Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:49:11 EDT
> >
> >
> >Perry,
> >Since you are converting to LDS beliefs, and giving up your job as
> >moderator, :>) you are going to have to get with it regards believing via
> >the
> >influence of the Holy Ghost, rather than the hard, tangible evidence you
> >have in  the
> >past gotten used to demanding.  I for one rely on the evidence of
praying
> >in
> >faith, then receiving the answer through the medium of the
> >spirit--Spirit-of-God direct to my receiver spirit.  But you do have to
> >have your receiver in
> >tune with the transmitters, Perry, otherwise this sort of  evidence does
> >not
> >work.  Just as when your radio is tuned off-station,  or not working at
> >all, or
> >out of range of the signal, all you will recieve is  static.  I am afraid
> >in
> >the past that  is all you have been receiving, for whatever reason--so
you
> >might consider  getting a renewing of the spiritual receiver, is all I am
> >saying.
> >New  spirits are extremely costly, they tell me, so that is obviously not
> >an
> >option.   Take Care, Perry, and good luck with your newly acquired
> >religion!!  And, Congratulations on becoming One With The Saints!!!
> >
> >Blainerb  (not baline, please!!)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >n a message dated 6/13/2005 6:55:55 AM Mountain Standard Time,
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> >Baline,
> >
> >Sometimes it is right to doubt. But, when  shown the evidence, even
Thomas
> >believed.  We will only know for sure  when you present the facts and let
> >me
> >evaluate them. The point is that if  there is no real evidence, then the
> >scripture is most likely not related  to the anecdote at all.
> >
> >Blaine, are you willing to admit  that since there is no real evidence,
> >then it is possible that the  scripture is not related to the anecdote?
> >
> >Perry
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to