Let us suppose that David Miller and
Judy Taylor have both understood and articulated an incorrect
understanding of the Nature of God therefore, by extension, the Gospel.
Let us suppose that Bill Taylor has apprehended and articulated this
more accurately.Or, let us suppose
the exact opposite is the case.
The SP discussion
The political discussion.
Left/right, Iraq, the G8, forgiving third word debt and, the like.
The Mormon 'gospel' or any other
'gospel' perceived by some to be a 'pseudo gospel'.
The 'holiness' discussion which
includes an understanding of sanctification, perfection, growing in
grace, 'spots & wrinkles' and, the like.
Versions of the Bible to preferred
over others.
So-called plain folks vs experts.
Some say 'just read the Bible, trust the Spirit to show you the meaning
then, do it'. Some say 'OK but, it's a little more complicated than
that'
etc., etc., etc.
People 'Amen' those who believe and
teach as they do. On a good day, they'll engage those who believe and
teach differently. On a bad day they'll ratchet things up a notch by
resorting to 'conduct unbecoming.'
So then, as to the subject: The
Spirit of God will not change one mind/heart on TT as to any of the
above.'Smiley's' aside nobody's gonna move from one position to
another. Who you are and, what you believe now is who you will be and
what you will believe when you die!
The exception that proves the rule:
John Smithson.
=================================================================
