Lance wrote: > One who has been reading you, David, > believes you to be 'Oneness' in your understanding > of the Godhead! IFF this were so then, you would've > gone further than being a non-trinitarian. You would > be anti-trinitarian. > > Will you kindly tell us if that person is correct?
That person is incorrect. I consider myself a Trinitarian. Having said that, let me also say that people who agree with the Trinity do not always see it the same way. In fact, many people hold to the idea of the Trinity as being a mystery that cannot be understood. I would disagree with this perspective. I believe that the Godhead can be understood, but it cannot be articulated well with words. In other words, there is a spiritual truth and understanding that is understandable in the heart, but not with language. I believe that modern day Oneness doctrine (sabellianism) helps bring balance to our understanding of the Godhead, and even Arianism at some times can tend to bring balance, but that is difficult for me to say because I am a Trinitarian who leans very heavily toward sabellianism (if you understand my drift here). Peace be with you. David Miller. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
