On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 10:54:49 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judy - the point of the article highlighted is plain enough. Did you miss the point? Or, is that first sentence an explanation of sorts of why the highlighted observation is true?You need to understand that you -- that is YOU - are not as resented as you might think. You command a lot of respect on this forum -- from those who disagree with you. I know. Trust me on this. BUT the highlighted comment below is true from my perspective. I know that I am constantly havng to correct your "play back" of my views -- and I see this in your response to several on this list.The problem? It has little to do with your ability to read or to comprehend. Perhaps if you actually tried to give others the benefit of the doubt -- I don't know. I do know that you you often ask me what I am saying.Anyway, from a frustrated fan (how did I do with my description of you? I gots to know.) JdI don't want to be responsible for telling you to keep taking drugs - Possibly 5% or one out of five.I am going to describe you. Tell if I am 10 % or 30% aor 90% will you. You are around my age (grandkids and all).Maybe .. I'm probably older than you are (just a little)And you are holiness pentecostal.No. Never have been.Your hair, if not gray, is brown , and more often than not roll it into a bun.No. Short hair (I don't equate hair with holiness).You wear glasses at least part of the time.Yes. But that's no biggie, most ppl do after age 46 or so.Your dresses are sleeved to below the elbow and very often wear black shoes with a square heel to church.No. I wear short sleeves, I do often wear black shoes but only because they match my purse and they don't have square heels, sorry JD but I don't fit your stereotype.And , you never miss church. how am I doing.Not good JD, I miss church if or when I need toI am still waiting, by the way.What for?Let's not forget that I pretty much pegged deegan.I must have missed you pegging DeeganIf I am right with you - I will stop taking this Vicodin !!
-----Original Message-----
From: Judy Taylor <jandgtaylor1@juno.com>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 10:33:29 -0400
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mary/Scripture/transubstantiation/interpretation
Probably because I don't agree with what these someone's are continually saying which does not mean I cannot comprehend what it is. Been there, done that. I've waded through all the "once saved always saved" jargonand the hard core predestination - both of which are Calvinistic rather than the doctrine of Christ as is this newall encompassing "incarnational" spin. Any doctrine that does not lead ppl professing Christ into godliness andholiness is a doctrine of devils. jtOn Sat, 09 Jul 2005 10:29:45 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:But seriously folks..Judy, I honestly don't know what name to give to what you do. It isn't 'conversation'. Your responses rarely reflects an understanding of what someone has said. "Who are you to say such a thing, Lance?' Nobody, Judy. I can't write but, I can observe. David 'covers your back.' Iz and Kevin tend toward 'you go girl' responses. John, Bill, Debbie and Caroline have taken several 'runs' at engaging you, all of which have been unsuccessful.I have every confidence that you won't respond in an understandable fasion but..here goes:
