Bill wrote: > David wrote concerning Terry's comment: > I found nothing dishonest in what you wrote. ... > There was definitely a problem in reading you. > > David, how do you presume to know this, other > than in the say way the rest of us might? Terry's > word will have to suffice, as far as I'm concerned. > Are you privy to something we're not?
I was just expressing my opinion, Bill. I didn't want Terry to think that everyone had trouble understanding him. Sometimes I feel that way when one person ascribes evil motives to me and the rest of the list is silent. I didn't want Terry to feel like something was wrong with the way he was communicating. Bill wrote: > By they way ... I don't remember anyone accusing > Terry of dishonesty. Why say that you "found nothing > dishonest" in what he wrote? Are you trying to be > manipulative? Manipulative? I have no idea what you mean. Terry perceived being accused of dishonesty. He wrote, "If that comment is less than honest..." My reason for posting was to encourage Terry. From my perspective, he was not even close to being dishonest. He was being misunderstood and the problem is more likely to be found to be from the evil surmisings in the minds of some of those who read him. I do not say this as a slam, but as something for us to consider soberly concerning why there is a problem with even the most innocuous of statements posted in this forum being misunderstood. Peace be with you. David Miller. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
