(Sorry in advance David but, that was much 'reading' of you.)
Lance has powerful insight that can only be termed sharp & piercing, he is even able to discern the thoughts and intents of the heart!
Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bill Taylor raises an interesting point hereunder. I also noted a
'recasting' of the content of some posts by David. He'd then be addressing
issues other than those germain to the originals. That was the reason I
intentionally 'defaulted' the match. I perceived it to have been quite
intentional therefore deceptive. (Sorry in advance David but, that was much
'reading' of you.)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: July 14, 2005 10:00
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] On playing chess & On reading/interpreting the
Scriptures for living (not for 'A' living)
> By they way, Miller, I don't remember anyone accusing Terry of dishonesty.
> Why say that you "found nothing dishonest" in what he wrote? Are you
trying
> to be manipulative?
>
> Bill
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 7:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] On playing chess & On reading/interpreting the
> Scriptures for living (not for 'A' living)
>
>
> > Terry wrote:
> > > I make a simple statement that there is not enough
> > > information to tell who would be the the most accurate
> > > interpreter of scriptures or the most mature believer
> > > between Bill, who I have never met, and a Russian,
> > > who I have never heard of. That is hardly placing one
> > > of you in Hell and the other outside the body of the
> > > Church. If that comment is less than honest, explain
> > > to me where I would have gotten the information needed
> > > to reach the same conclusion as Lance.
> >
> > I found nothing dishonest in what you wrote, Terry. I was amazed that
> your
> > post was interpreted the way it was. There was definitely a problem in
> > reading you.
> >
> > You mention something in this post that is somewhat interesting. You
> > mention both "accurate interpreter of scriptures" and "most mature
> > believer." Do you think these are related? Are more mature believers
> more
> > accurate interpreters of Scripture? My comments on this thread
concerned
> > only the ability to understand the intent of the Holy Ghost in the
> Scripture
> > he inspired to be written. Perhaps part of the disconnect in
> communicating
> > on this is that some connect the idea of "accuracy interpreter of
> > scriptures" and "maturity of believers" in a more definite way. That
was
> > perhaps part of Lance's perspective, that one cannot accurately
interpret
> > Scripture without having time for maturity, regardless of the
involvement
> of
> > the Holy Spirit.
> >
> > What do you think? Is the maturity of the believer something important
in
> > regards to the ability to understand the intended meaning of Scripture?
> Is
> > maturity a requirement before one can understand the Holy Spirit's
intent
> in
> > Scripture?
> >
> > Peace be with you.
> > David Miller.
> >
> > ----------
> > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
> know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6)
> http://www.InnGlory.org
> >
> > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a
> friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
> >
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

