What I see in the writings below
is a man who knows full well that he cannot insist on
Spirit revealed truth "on every
occasion" and, yet, insists upon the infallible belief of infallible
understanding -- I guess because he really believes that his
thinking HAS to line up with truth or he is lost. And so the Spirit
gives infallible understanding (interpretation) the first time,
sometimes -- but every time if
it concerns certain critical but unnamed doctrines. On other
occasions, maturity and joint participation (fellowship) give rise to
correct understanding -- but only occasionally, God putting a stop to
it if appears that one is getting dependent upon such circumstances.
And if I have a doctrine that I claim is from God and DM has an opposing teaching, DM is the preferred teaching because
his is infallible while S
mithson's teaching, using just as much if not more scripture is
wrong because, well, because it does not agree with the infallible
version. Smithson can't be the one who is right if it conflicts with Miller's infallible understanding.
That is the teaching in a NUTshell, as I see it. And a truly understandable teaching it is !!
JD
==================================================================
