|
"YOUR SCRIPTURES'???? THAT JUDY IS THE
PROBLEM.
It is called perspectivalism. There is truth. There
is absolute truth. SOMETIMES it is even that which you/David
cite/speak/proclaim. However, sometimes that which either/both of you
cite/speak/proclaim is partially or completely FALSE.
Would either/both of you acknowledge
this?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: July 22, 2005 09:49
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:John
16:13,14
JD you need to be taken to task for your scandalous
misquoting. You have no idea what DM
is saying but you constantly mock at the way he
expresses himself and take personal offense
If you don't agree with him then get your scriptures
together and challenge him. Noone has the
whole loaf JD but the effect of what I believe is
taking me from glory to glory - you should have
seen what I was and I am nowhere near what I will be
in spike of naysayers like you, Lance,
and whoever else is one with you in your folly.
I do not scoff at you -- but this teaching,
absolutely. The fact that neither you nor DM can effectively deal with the consequences of your own
teaching is evidence that I am
correct (well, ok, Lance
too) to a passionate conviction of "certainty."
Rather than pointing out the fact of my socffetry, why not correct the content of my
statement? In other words, prove me wrong
JD From:
Judy Taylor < jandgtaylor1@juno.com>
And JD sits in
the seat of the scornful/scoffer - either is appropriate!!
For those of us who are onlookers - how do we decide, here? Judy's opinion is clearly
NOT just an opinion in her view - rather one of those
"infallible" thingy's. The fact tht DM is
clearly correcting her reveals that he, too, speaks ex-cathedra
Do we not see what this false teaching brings us to? And
what is that? "Only I am right by the giftedness of the
Indwelling." An impossible doctrine, at
best. The very height of arrogance at worse.
JD From: Judy Taylor
< jandgtaylor1@juno. com>
I am a whole lot more concerned with the "Risen
Christ" Lance - I don't need to have a "weak in the flesh"
Christ or an "eternal son" Christ. He did
defeat principalities, powers, and wicked spirits and he made
a
show of them openly. He has handed us the
victory so now it is up to us to walk in it. Jesus
overcame
in the wilderness by using the Sword of the
Spirit which is the Word of God.
Now Lance, if I were going to take what you write seriously I would have to go to the Lord
and tell Him
that the Comforter He sent me to lead me into all
truth is not doing His job and helping me because after
25+ years I am still
not able to apprehend that for which I am
apprehended and so therefore my Sword
is useless. Lance said
so. jt
Indeed Judy, one can take that to the bank.
However, often your understanding of these selfsame Scriptures are not
'bankable'. I'm watching the conversation between you
and David. This then is proof positive. You would agree, would you not
that ONE OF YOU IS MISAPPREHENDING THE MEANING OF SCRIPTURE REGARDING
THE HUMANITY OF CHRIST?.
Nailing jello is much more like trying to
pin down men with deceitful hearts
who change like the wind. Whereas the
Word of God is the same Yesterday,
Today, and Forever. You can say "It is
written" and as the saying goes "take
it to the Bank"
From: "Lance Muir" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sorry David but this is
a meaningless statement in this context. There is not a single
participant who'd not subscribe to what you've said hereunder.
(opinion-low, Bible-high) Do you know the _expression_ 'its like
attempting to nail jello'?
I will have departed TT actually 'knowing' you to have
been wrong as to your
understanding of Scripture and its
employment in teaching and life.(NOT
broadly and, on every issue)
This being the case one's confidence in other
matters is genuinely
subject to serious questioning.
> Lance wrote: >> Who, pray tell David, occupies the
position you've >> described. Do you know such a person and,
will >> you introduce her/him to us? > >
Who? Me, Judy, Terry, Izzy, Kevin, etc. We all
take the position that > our > opinion means
little. What is important is what the Bible
says. > > Peace be with you. > David
Miller. > > ---------- > "Let your speech be always
with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may > know how you
ought to answer every man." ( Colossians 4:6) > http://www.InnGlory.org> > If you do
not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you hav e a > friend who wants to join, tell him to
send an e-mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be
subscribed. >
---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned
with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man."
( Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be
unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants
to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be
subscribed.
|
