So-called love without truth is not love at all JD, it
is spiritual whoredom. Holiness is part of the package
and any gospel bypassing this is not the gospel
preached by Paul or any of the apostles. Look at TT, we can't
agree with each other any more than we do with the
Mormon boys about what the Bible actually says - why is
that? Discussion is OK but when ppl start
being dogmatic we are back to the inquisition - forced unity is
no
unity - and truth perishes in the streets.
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 02:07:42 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You stand against the spirit of unity and function as if love of the brethren was a meaningless concept.Jd
From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No need to put anyone "out" JD. The Word of God is divisive and people who are not willing to do thingsHis way get offended and eventually separate themselves. That is, unless there is a compromising preacherwho wants to please ppl more than he wants to please God. jtOn Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:11:14 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Legalists, when "holding office" in the Church of Right Teaching, do IN FACT require agreement on (their) pet issues or you are out. Such happens every week of every year in the U.S.JD
From: Judy Taylor <jandgtaylor1@juno.com>
Since I've been accused of being one of the God manipulators - might I put my 2 cents in here please.Let me say that I am not requiring anything of anyone. So far as I'm concerned you Gary and everyone elsecan do whatever they want - but your blood will not be on my hands, nor on that of anyone else who hastried to speak truth to you. Those who reject truth judge themselves as unworthy and eventually God Himselfgives them over to strong delusion so that they might believe the lie. jtOn Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:41:15 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:for humans biblical salvation is purely voluntary, like the Alamo--you wanna defend the KoG in history with JC, cross his line in the sandthis is obedience to him--salvation (via 'a crucifixion') you volunteer for is just that, voluntarywho, then, as a volunteer, has any right to compel the involuntary religious obedience of another?while the G-m's (God-manipulators) among us do exactly that requiring y/our compliance by a certain force, ask 'compliance? to whom?'i'd say these G-m types never volunteered for nothin' worth volunteerin' for and that's their real problem; FTR, neither God's nor mineOn Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:32:32 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:To argue that salvation is free but after the initial event, we must obey to maintain this salvation is wrong on several levels:||6. [re: pronouncing] 'that what God could not do for man, man must do for himself !!'||
