Re: [TruthTalk] The Humanity of Jesus

[ttxpress]

(while jt has to decide which statement, below, is better theoloG ) Is there any doubt which statement is theologically plausible?   ftr, the NT traffics in theological plausibility, not in false *thesis/antithesis*   On Sat, 6 Aug 2005 18:38:41 -0400 Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   [To:]   * "If [JC] came in the likeness of men, he was a man, and if he came in the likeness of sinful flesh, then he had sinful, corruptible flesh." *   [cp.]   If [JC] came in the likeness of men, he was [like men], and if he came in the likeness of sinful flesh, then h[is was like] sinful..flesh.