JD wrote: > JT asked what constituted "intelligent discussion." > It is that discussion that seeks to not only impart > knowledge but is willing to receive knowledge > from others, as well.
I hope you intend to lead us by example in this area. JD wrote: > Judgmentalism is not a part of the discussion Any discussion that does not include judgment would be a poor discussion, just plain boring too. We must make judgments and then put forth the proper reasoning to support those judgments. What do you mean by "Judgmentalism"? Do you really mean prejudice? JD wrote: > Intelligent discussion is impossible when one is convinced > that the counsel of others is not needed in the pursuit of > "truth." If this were true, then Jesus Christ would not have been capable of intelligent discussion! What other human's counsel was he convinced that he needed? Peace be with you. David Miller. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
