|
If all that Jesus did was to 'leave us an example'
then we're 'cooked'.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: October 02, 2005 04:53
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mythology and
the "list"
From what I recall you read this into some passage in
the book of Revelation JD. However if you got someone
trained in statistics to compare the number of
those at the end to all who have ever lived what would
this percentage
look like? The walk of
faith is not a list of Gk words and/or doctrines JD so these are a moot
point. We must overcome
where A&E failed.
Jesus did it while in the flesh and He left us an example - His are the
steps we are to follow. It is
working out your own salvation with fear and trembling rather than a religious good 'ol boy network
who all subscribe
to the same self serving 'big picture' - and
that's my monologue for today. jt
Again , you make comment that has little to do with what I have
written. At least you are consistent.
You really like the sound of the "narrow road" thingy, don'e
you? I prefer the part that says there are so many, they cannot
be counted.
JD From:
Judy Taylor < jandgtaylor1@juno.com>
So?
We may be at different places in our pilgrimage but
are basically travelling the same road
which is the
narrow path with he strait gate. Whereas
others on TT appear to be breathing
rarified air and on the
broad road ... jt
I have a definition and fully understand what "judgmentalism"
is. Nothing double tongued about it. Give me your
definition and I'll share mine. The clear reason why you
Wingers refuse to present a list of doctrines upon which we
must all agree has to do with the impossibility of the matter
-- your list, Deegan's list, Judy's list or DM's
list would not be the same !!! So you all pretend to agree
with each other while refusing, at the same time, to offer specifics as to
this mythological list. You judge others to hell but
refuse to be accountable. &n
bsp; Ditto on this definition for judgmentalism. You all cannot give a definition
that does not find yourselves at fault.
But I already knew this.
JD -----Original
Message----- From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
[email protected]Sent: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:56:19
-0500 Subject: RE: Re: [TruthTalk] an argument from the gay community
for homosecuality
How can you be so double-tongued, JD? You accuse me of
that all the time!!! iz
I believe it is spelled "judgmentalism," Bub, and why bring up the word anyway
- no one on the right has a clue as to its definition. Hard to
accuse someone of it when you
don't know what it is.
JD -----Original
Message----- From: Kevin Deegan < openairmission@yahoo.com> To:
[email protected]Sent: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:29:17 -0700
(PDT) Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an argument from the gay community for
homosexuality
And your Judgemental
too!
Is your Brand of HATE speech and JUDGEMENTALISM allowed in the People's Republique of CANUCKastan?
Lance Muir
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kevin: Y'all confuse HONESTY with HATEFULNESS. Y'all don't SPEAK, Kevin,
y'all SPEW! JD has recognized this 'bout
y'all since I bin on TT.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: September 29, 2005
15:51
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an
argument from the gay community for homosecuality
Stop being so HATEfull
Lance. Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
He did indeed 'hit sin on the head',
Judy. Mostly however, he hit it on the head with those in the 'churches' of
His day. That ring any bells with any of you out there? (Judy,
Kevin, Iz) At
whom/with whom do we see His anger most expressed? At whom/with whom
do we see the opposite? Why look, it's the very ones y'all choose
to hate, demonstrate against etc. Hmmmmmmmmmm strange hugh? Do we all read the
sa me Bible?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: September 29, 2005
07:52
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an
argument from the gay community for homosecuality
Why arn't you
talking about the "gay issue?" We are supposed to minister
the way Jesus did as He is our example
and He always hit sin head on ie He confronted the rich young ruler
with his heart of covetousness which he was not
yet willing to part with. Jesus didn't chase after him and keep
talking about grace. He did minister to those God showed
Him and warned them to go and sin no more lest a
worse thing come upon
them. But He didn't minister to everyone he met.
Today we take sin so lightly because we don't believe God means what He
says or that the chaos in our lives is rooted
in sin and unrighteousness. God is supposed
to bless this mess because of grace,
because he loves us so much and this
is the lie.
He will not do it because to do so He would have to violate
His own Word. You can talk grace till the cows
come home but until this person hears the truth
and is willing to repent from the heart God will not honor
your words JD.
Well, maybe God
has put us together "for such a time as this."
Right now the relationship is something of a
novelty -- at least for him. My
conversation with him is different from "the
others." So, maybe I might be able to make sense
to him. What I am not doing is talking about
the gay issue, per se. He is but I am trying
to get him to stop and examine what it means when it says
that "Christ died for us while we were YET
sinners." My concern is that he understand
the gospel of grace and , and, and, what it really mean
s to be "saved." The new birth will
produce - given time
............... so that is where I begin
-----------&n bsp; with the new birth.
JD ====================================
I wish you well. Terry
|
