The same 'who' that set up you, Iz, David & Kevin. That's WHO!
----- Original Message -----
Sent: October 10, 2005 12:25
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Antinomianism Refuted

From my vantage point - DavidM understands and you don't.
Whether or not Jesus had a fallen Adamic nature is the only issue I am aware of
that we disagree about.
 
As to braggadocious ... Your group are the only ones accusing him and this is mild
compared to some other accusations I have read from you ppl....  Who set you and
your cronies up to evaluate another man's servant? 
 
 
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:13:46 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nice word, braggadocious, David. Once again, you fail to note that it
> and, a
> variety of synomyms have been used to describe YOU. In the face of
> this  yet
> do you come back at those who so identify you with anecdotes
> illustrating
> your humility.
>
> The citation of names has naught to do with popularity, David. It
> could but,
> it needn't. Do you not see that? I actually know some of these
> people and
> I'd take their evaluation of Judy over yours any day. (I still,
> FWIW, see
> you as a person who doesn't know himself all that well.)
>
> Explain please: 'I do not..claim..understanding' against 'I observe
> that you
> guys fail to understand' (meaning YOU DO UNDERSTAND) Which is it?
> You do &
> we don't? You don't & we don't? (maybe nobody but God does)
>
>  Original Message -----
> From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: October 10, 2005 12:02
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Antinomianism Refuted
>
>
> > Lance wrote:
> >> As I believe that Debbie, Caroline, Jonathan,
> >> Bill, Gary and,  JD (I'll leave myself out) have
> >> ALL understood Judy then, I cannot but believe that
> >> it is YOU who don't. So much for speaking infallibly.
> >
> > Truth is not determined by a popularity contest.  This assumption
> has
> > proved
> > to be one of the most serious errors in the way you think. 
> Nevertheless,
> > I
> > do not make any special claims to understanding Judy.  I have just
>
> > observed
> > time and time again where you guys fail to understand her points.
> >
> > By the way, why are some of you so braggadocious on the list? 
> After
> > awhile
> > it appears quite unbecoming, especially for a Christian.
> >
> > Peace be with you.
> > David Miller.
> >
> > ----------
> > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that
> you may
> > know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
> > http://www.InnGlory.org
> >
> > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email
> to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you
> have a
> > friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
> >
>
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you
> may know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
> http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you
> have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
>
>
 

Reply via email to